T Nation

Proof Christians Are Nuts!!!!!!

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

[quote]texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

[/quote]

That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Not very original…think up your own damned threads!!

;D

[quote]haney1 wrote:
texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

That is a broad brush you are painting with…[/quote]

it is indeed.

[quote]haney1 wrote:
texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

That is a broad brush you are painting with…[/quote]

Thats the point. It’s Satire of HH’s thread, which he won’t actually respond to accept to acknowledge it’s technically a joke.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Thats the point. It’s Satire of HH’s thread, which he won’t actually respond to accept to acknowledge it’s technically a joke.
[/quote]

Aren’t you in college? And you don’t proofread what you write? Its ‘except’, not ‘accept’.

Read the 11th edition of the dictionary and study the principles of Ingsoc, Winston.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:

Thats the point. It’s Satire of HH’s thread, which he won’t actually respond to accept to acknowledge it’s technically a joke.
[/quote]

perhaps I should have made my joke a little clearer.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Thats the point. It’s Satire of HH’s thread, which he won’t actually respond to accept to acknowledge it’s technically a joke.

Aren’t you in college? And you don’t proofread what you write? Its ‘except’, not ‘accept’.

Read the 11th edition of the dictionary and study the principles of Ingsoc, Winston.

[/quote]

Once again refusing to deal with the actual issue at hand. Very nice, HH.

And I’m sorry for the grammar error (which is more of a forgetful typo really), I do not proof read my posts, and I apologize if my slightly off grammar offends you.

And Haney1, reading what you said again, I kinda feel stupid bout my response! My fault.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Thats the point. It’s Satire of HH’s thread, which he won’t actually respond to accept to acknowledge it’s technically a joke.

Aren’t you in college? And you don’t proofread what you write? Its ‘except’, not ‘accept’.

Read the 11th edition of the dictionary and study the principles of Ingsoc, Winston.

[/quote]

Oh, and you forgot the apostrophe in ‘it’s’.

[quote]haney1 wrote:
That is a broad brush you are painting with…[/quote]

Exactly. Proof that HH is nuts!!!

[quote]lixy wrote:
haney1 wrote:
That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Exactly. Proof that HH is nuts!!![/quote]

no my relatives are nuts! He is just very one sided in his opinions, and passionate about it no less.

Usually it is our stregths that double as our weakness.

[quote]haney1 wrote:
lixy wrote:
haney1 wrote:
That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Exactly. Proof that HH is nuts!!!

no my relatives are nuts! He is just very one sided in his opinions, and passionate about it no less.

Usually it is our stregths that double as our weakness. [/quote]

Actually, it’s excessive virtues that become sins, but you got the expression close without even knowing it :slight_smile:

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
lixy wrote:
haney1 wrote:
That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Exactly. Proof that HH is nuts!!!

no my relatives are nuts! He is just very one sided in his opinions, and passionate about it no less.

Usually it is our stregths that double as our weakness.

Actually, it’s excessive virtues that become sins, but you got the expression close without even knowing it :slight_smile:

[/quote]

well even us x-republicans now turned libertarian get a thing or two correct from time to time.

[quote]haney1 wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
lixy wrote:
haney1 wrote:
That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Exactly. Proof that HH is nuts!!!

no my relatives are nuts! He is just very one sided in his opinions, and passionate about it no less.

Usually it is our stregths that double as our weakness.

Actually, it’s excessive virtues that become sins, but you got the expression close without even knowing it :slight_smile:

well even us x-republicans now turned libertarian get a thing or two correct from time to time.
[/quote]

Since we’ve decided this is to be a grammar Nazi controlled thread, I must say this:

It’s ex-republican. Not ‘x’.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
lixy wrote:
haney1 wrote:
That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Exactly. Proof that HH is nuts!!!

no my relatives are nuts! He is just very one sided in his opinions, and passionate about it no less.

Usually it is our stregths that double as our weakness.

Actually, it’s excessive virtues that become sins, but you got the expression close without even knowing it :slight_smile:

well even us x-republicans now turned libertarian get a thing or two correct from time to time.

Since we’ve decided this is to be a grammar Nazi controlled thread, I must say this:

It’s ex-republican. Not ‘x’.
[/quote]

this we’ve that you speak of doesn’t include me so I will rebel against the we’ve. Fight the power!

[quote]texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

[/quote]

LOL

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Thats the point. It’s Satire of HH’s thread, which he won’t actually respond to accept to acknowledge it’s technically a joke.

Aren’t you in college? And you don’t proofread what you write? Its ‘except’, not ‘accept’.

Read the 11th edition of the dictionary and study the principles of Ingsoc, Winston.

Oh, and you forgot the apostrophe in ‘it’s’.[/quote]

Are you sure? Isn’t the apostrophe for the possessive form? Anyway, I’m an old math teacher who hasn’t written a paper in years (eons) and my writing is still better than yours.

And I have the courtesy to proofread what I write, for those who suffer and read it.

[quote]lixy wrote:
haney1 wrote:
That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Exactly. Proof that HH is nuts!!![/quote]

This from a Moroccan Muslim who flees to Sweden because his culture is oppressive and won’t open a college in his country, then comes on an American site to tell us we’re all evil…ROFLMAO!!!

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Are you sure? Isn’t the apostrophe for the possessive form? [/quote]

Are you freakin’ serious?

I have little respect for those who can’t even master their own tongue.

My English is average, but at least I have four other languages to communicate with.

Is the “old math teacher” reference supposed to
make us cut you some slack? You started with the whole grammar thing. And please leave others judge your writing.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
haney1 wrote:
texasguy wrote:
http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-identity

http://www.answers.com/topic/freedomites

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-army-of-god

http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-extremist-terrorism

http://www.crosscurrents.org/weaver0701.htm

That is a broad brush you are painting with…

Thats the point. It’s Satire of HH’s thread, which he won’t actually respond to accept to acknowledge it’s technically a joke.

Aren’t you in college? And you don’t proofread what you write? Its ‘except’, not ‘accept’.

Read the 11th edition of the dictionary and study the principles of Ingsoc, Winston.

Oh, and you forgot the apostrophe in ‘it’s’.

Are you sure? Isn’t the apostrophe for the possessive form? Anyway, I’m an old math teacher who hasn’t written a paper in years (eons) and my writing is still better than yours.

And I have the courtesy to proofread what I write, for those who suffer and read it.

[/quote]

It’s is always a contraction of “it” and “is”. ‘Its’ is the possessive form of ‘it’.

And regardless, you still haven’t said anything about the purpose of this thread. You’ve managed to avoid it completely.