[quote]Naked Sweat Drip wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Your cameraman doesn’t lift, does he? A lifter would KNOW to be sure to show your squat from head to toe, and not cut off the part we need to see most. ;)[/quote]
Haha he does, just a bad camera man. He went up a little heavier than me that day to 405 for 12 same box height, just above parallel.
[quote]lemony2j wrote:
It looks like the guy on the right ate the guy on the left in those pics! Very impressed with your progress on every body part.
What have you done to attain such monstrous quads? Anything special/different? I’m guessing they are a strong point naturally but worth an ask
[/quote]
Thanks I really appreciate it. Looking sick in your avi btw. I would say that since I " figured" out how to train legs they grow very easily. I have to preach John Meadows techniques for legs. I could post pictures of my legs from a couple of years ago when i was squatting only slightly lighter than what I am now and my legs look like chit.
I really didn’t get the mass and shape until I started doing mountain dog style training, crazy hamstring work first and then doing hard hard nasty 3 second negatives with drop sets on the leg press. Call me crazy but I would credit most of my leg mass to those nasty leg press drop sets followed up with a close stance smith squat… I know sac-religous right. . I would not credit barbell squats with much of my leg development,
Thanks man, I completely understand what your saying, this time last year I was focusing on bb squats with no more than 5 reps per set and got up to a reasonable 1rm but my legs didn’t reflect this at all. I’ve completely changed my leg training since September pretty much as you’ve described and I’m noticing changes already, so hopefully I’m on the right track! And I’m trying hard to not come across all fanboy for John Meadows methods but they work, simple as that