If every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of attack and defence, to attack him by night or in superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the commonwealth, be called immoral and not permissible?
Over 130 posts about HIV not causing AIDs and none on 9/11, wow.
I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to say exactly. That is one long sentence.
If you are saying we should be able to sneak up and gut douchebags like the guy who made that documentary, I agree. If you meant something else, say it in English.