Pope: 'Pedos Not That Bad'

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
�?�¢??In the 1970s, paedophilia was theorised as something fully in conformity with man and even with children,�?�¢?? the Pope said.

Ã??Ã?¢??It was maintained Ã??Ã?¢?? even within the realm of Catholic theology Ã??Ã?¢?? that there is no such thing as evil in itself or good in itself. There is only a Ã??Ã?¢??better than’ and a Ã??Ã?¢??worse than’. Nothing is good or bad in itself.Ã??Ã?¢??

Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/popersquos-child-porn-normal-claim-sparks-outrage-among-victims-15035449.html#ixzz2FyQ445FD

Moral relativism at its finest…

May the God you invented forgive you.[/quote]

Only if you’d be half as logical as Rand you’d realize from the article alone that the Pope was addressing moral relativism and the destruction it has had, evident of the 1970’s.
[/quote]

Rand wouldn’t know logic from her own hairy ass. She’s merely a tool for pseudo-intellectuals, who think ‘Ren and Stimpy’ was hilarious. Her Objectivism was a laughably bad philosophy. Despite it’s capitalistic underpinnings it’s a totally worthless philosophy. Capitalism’s virtues can stand alone without being attached to bad and unrealistic philosophy that ironically is illogical as a moral philosophy. It’s basically a over complicated moral relativism, which is false by demonstration.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:<<< Only if you’d be half as logical as Rand you’d realize from the article alone that the Pope was addressing moral relativism and the destruction it has had, evident of the 1970’s. [/quote]That was what I got out of it which is why I said that I don’t think he’s saying what they say he’s saying. As much as I don’t buy the papacy and as loud as my criticism is of that church, there is just no way that somebody who would declare what this article attributes to B16 could become pope in the first place.