IMO (but closer to a fact) I feel THAT almost all current POPULAR authors on here are a regurgitation of Poliquin. His presence has been less and less over the years on this website and recently (LIGHTLY renewed) in the last year. I have to say that none of the popular authors really are as creative as they portray. Some of the things they proclaim as there ow cutting edge progams, I have written in journals from Poliquin seminars in 1999.
I do appreciate authors filling a void but have to say much if not any of there programs are as good as the source. YES I KNOW That Poliquin has built off many before him, but ( in such away that his principles have become uniquely his, where i dont feel that way about current authors. IMO the only author that offered the yin to Poliquin’s yang was Ian King. Everyone else just regurgitates Poliquin’s principles.
The thing most dont realize on here is that he shares only about ten percent of what he is actually doing on these articles ( he with hold’s allot ) holds the rest for seminars, clients and the tip top for pro athlete clients. I really dont feel that the envelope has been pushed in recent years with regards to training, nutrition or supplementation design from the current crop of authors except from the minutia available to us from Poliquin.