[quote]rainjack wrote:
InTheZone wrote:
What is wrong with a thread with a bunch of us in agreement?
How is that not the most diplomatic and best approach to keep from any possible bias or complaint afterwards of being singled out by the douchebag?
Why is this not obvious to some of us here?
One guy doing it sucks, no matter how respectful or long he’s been here. And I still think mods or TC will look at numbers of complaints from difft people more than any one guy.
I was replying to World. [/quote]
No, I know that,
I’m not just expressing that to you Rainjack, but to you and other guys thinking that it might work. Hell, it could, and at this point, if nobody wants to try the thread, I’ll vote for you.
I just see people somewhere down the line, disagreeing with one person being in charge, whether rightfully doling out terminations or not, it’s just human nature that we’ll start getting regulars disagreeing/arguing, and the whole thing would get ugly again. I could have my head up my ass too, bare that in mind, lol.
Anyway, like I said, let’s hear from some more guys. Hell there’s a lot of very experienced guys that sit back and chill too, that haven’t chimed in yet still. Even a “committee” of about 10 “vets”,(such as these other guys) 2the, lil guy, saps, you get the picture), (regular long time experienced guys) handling shit by chiming in on a group thread. We aren’t going to have that many trolls for long this way, and it could be used sparingly when shit calms down with clowns on the forum.
It would be easy as hell. We’re talking about guys who post often, so would see within a day, give or take, when some problem child needs dealing with as it appears on their thread, and then they vote in. Majority rule at whatever split desired by everyone…7/10 or whatever…
Talk to me guys…