[quote]UtahLama wrote:
On another note, think about how many people were employed designing and building that bitch.
[/quote]
And that actually got paid to WORK…
[/quote]
And imagine how many more jobs could have been created with that kind of money? Infrastructure repair anyone? What was the net loss of jobs because of what this money was spent on?[/quote]
I know right?
Imagine if the government “created” jobs for everyone and the minimum wage was set at $15/hr. The economy would be booming then!!
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
On another note, think about how many people were employed designing and building that bitch.
[/quote]
And that actually got paid to WORK…
[/quote]
And imagine how many more jobs could have been created with that kind of money? Infrastructure repair anyone? What was the net loss of jobs because of what this money was spent on?[/quote]
So your not happy with how government is spending your money? Or are you just unhappy with how they are spending other peoples money, by not giving more to you?
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
And imagine how many more jobs could have been created with that kind of money? Infrastructure repair anyone? What was the net loss of jobs because of what this money was spent on?[/quote]
Ah, even when liberals try to talk like fiscal conservatives, they can’t help spending other people’s money.
Economically, the most efficient way to use money to stimulate the economy is to not confiscate the money and use it on any government project. Of any kind. Instead, the most economically efficient way of stimulating the economy is to NOT CONFISCATE THE MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE. Let people keep their money. Each individual is in the best place to decide how to most efficiently use their money.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
And imagine how many more jobs could have been created with that kind of money? Infrastructure repair anyone? What was the net loss of jobs because of what this money was spent on?[/quote]
Ah, even when liberals try to talk like fiscal conservatives, they can’t help spending other people’s money.
Economically, the most efficient way to use money to stimulate the economy is to not confiscate the money and use it on any government project. Of any kind. Instead, the most economically efficient way of stimulating the economy is to NOT CONFISCATE THE MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE. Let people keep their money. Each individual is in the best place to decide how to most efficiently use their money.
This has been proven over and over again.[/quote]
Agreed.
Every time one person tries to better their personal situation, economically, some other person has to benefit as well, in a free society, otherwise no transaction (the betterment) would take place.
(Yes progressives, I know, third parties might get hurt or “exploited”.)
Therefore if everyone tries to better themselves, and the society is left free as reasonably possible (still need law and order) the society benefits as a whole.
Repeat this a couple hundred million times and even those third parties, if allowed to be free, and choose what it is that is a benefit for themselves, will end up further along than a society centrally planned by even the smartest of intellectual.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
And imagine how many more jobs could have been created with that kind of money? Infrastructure repair anyone? What was the net loss of jobs because of what this money was spent on?[/quote]
Ah, even when liberals try to talk like fiscal conservatives, they can’t help spending other people’s money.
Economically, the most efficient way to use money to stimulate the economy is to not confiscate the money and use it on any government project. Of any kind. Instead, the most economically efficient way of stimulating the economy is to NOT CONFISCATE THE MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE. Let people keep their money. Each individual is in the best place to decide how to most efficiently use their money.
This has been proven over and over again.[/quote]
Agreed.
Every time one person tries to better their personal situation, economically, some other person has to benefit as well, in a free society, otherwise no transaction (the betterment) would take place.
(Yes progressives, I know, third parties might get hurt or “exploited”.)
Therefore if everyone tries to better themselves, and the society is left free as reasonably possible (still need law and order) the society benefits as a whole.
Repeat this a couple hundred million times and even those third parties, if allowed to be free, and choose what it is that is a benefit for themselves, will end up further along than a society centrally planned by even the smartest of intellectual.
[/quote]
You guys are racists. Zep is only trying to help the little people. The people that have been enslaved by the Progressives now for 3 generations.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
And imagine how many more jobs could have been created with that kind of money? Infrastructure repair anyone? What was the net loss of jobs because of what this money was spent on?[/quote]
Ah, even when liberals try to talk like fiscal conservatives, they can’t help spending other people’s money.
Economically, the most efficient way to use money to stimulate the economy is to not confiscate the money and use it on any government project. Of any kind. Instead, the most economically efficient way of stimulating the economy is to NOT CONFISCATE THE MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE. Let people keep their money. Each individual is in the best place to decide how to most efficiently use their money.
This has been proven over and over again.[/quote]
And yet Republicans are constantly talking about the need for MORE defense spending. Remember Mitt the government doesn’t create jobs but I want to expand defense by two trillion to stimulate the economy Romney?
Liberals aren’t the only ones who want to take your money, so does the other “major” party. The need for a third party is great.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
And imagine how many more jobs could have been created with that kind of money? Infrastructure repair anyone? What was the net loss of jobs because of what this money was spent on?[/quote]
Ah, even when liberals try to talk like fiscal conservatives, they can’t help spending other people’s money.
Economically, the most efficient way to use money to stimulate the economy is to not confiscate the money and use it on any government project. Of any kind. Instead, the most economically efficient way of stimulating the economy is to NOT CONFISCATE THE MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE. Let people keep their money. Each individual is in the best place to decide how to most efficiently use their money.
This has been proven over and over again.[/quote]
And yet Republicans are constantly talking about the need for MORE defense spending. Remember Mitt the government doesn’t create jobs but I want to expand defense by two trillion to stimulate the economy Romney?
Liberals aren’t the only ones who want to take your money, so does the other “major” party. The need for a third party is great. [/quote]
Funny, but you sound like what the real TEA Party people are saying and want – budget control.
(As opposed to how the TEA Party is portrayed by the Democrat-controlled media.)
The establishment Republicans whom you quote hate the TEA Party worst than they hate the Democrats. In fact, the RINOs love the Democrats — the tails to their head on the same coin.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Pentagon wants to build real Iron Man Suit within 12 months…
A vanishingly small drop in the bucket, but I really wish taxpayers weren’t paying wannabe Michael Bays to make laughable videos complete with ripoff soundtracks for the military.
[quote]Karado wrote:
Well beam me up Scotty and May The Force be with him, … “Captain Kirk” will be the
Commanding Officer, The Big Kahuna, The Master Of Disaster.
Not just any old Captain Kirk, but Captain James Kirk. They had to do that on purpose.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Pentagon wants to build real Iron Man Suit within 12 months…
A vanishingly small drop in the bucket, but I really wish taxpayers weren’t paying wannabe Michael Bays to make laughable videos complete with ripoff soundtracks for the military.[/quote]
Right?
I mean come on. Is your name Tony Stark? Do YOU have an arc reactor in your chest cavity? No? Then fucking stop trying to be a supergenius.