It's funny, to me you are the O'Reilly of the political boards. For the most part you throw out typical left wing fodder, and try and claim you are not a liberal because you aren't totally on board with restrictive firearm policies. This is much like O'Reilly claiming he's not a conservative because he found some minor issue to disagree with Republicans about, like the border.
For the record I am an atheist libertarian, but much like you I think it is important to point out that some people are all about an agenda, and you clearly are. You are an obnoxious know it all just like O'Reilly; you are the pot calling the kettle black.
And for the record, F U for stating that "I doubt many conservatives would let many Iraqi families even live with them if the opportunity arose but they will cheer on sending people to die for them". As much as I am anti-war I acknowledge the fact that middle America and the South provide the lions share of troops, and the lions share of conservative voters. The craven idea that they would prefer their sons and daughters to die before housing Iraqi's is absurd, and a ridiculous statement you should reconsider. What do you think the demographcis were of those folks who took in evacuees after Katrina? Hazard a guess? you'd be amazed what "Conservatives" can do when put to the test, they're almost human.
To use one of your favorite defenses, they're rubber and you are glue. You are as much of a hack as O'Reilly ever was, you just don't have a platform.
BTW, the fact that someone has lost a loved one in battle does NOT grant them special consideration when determining the prosecution of war. In most wars, this one especially, the relatives of the fallen support the war. Why does Cindy Sheehan deserve more respect than those? Because she camped out in Bush's neighborhood?