T Nation

Obama's Global Poverty Act


#1

"A nice-sounding bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

"The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends."

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-global-tax-proposal-up-for-senate-vote/

Obama is a pure elitist, draining the middle class of this country, to allegedly help the poor. No matter that the money would do little to help the poor but the money has to be forced out of the hard-working middle class of this country.

Maybe he could just send some of his or Pastor Wright's millions over...the fucking dog shit elitist!!


#2

I’m surprised this hasn’t gotten more press. Good find HH.

mike


#3

Someone in the Senate is sponsoring legislation to add a box for extra voluntary contributions on all tax returns so those like Obama and the Hildebeeste can put their money where their mouths are.


#4

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
"A nice-sounding bill called the “Global Poverty Act,” sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States.
[/quote]

Du…
Wha?

I couldn’t read any of the rest of your post because my brain asploded after reading that.

At least the bill is accurately named! Such a ridiculous bill really would spread poverty across the globe.


#5

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-2433

S 2433 IS

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 2433
To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

December 7, 2007

Mr. OBAMA (for himself, Mr. HAGEL, and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations


A BILL
To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Global Poverty Act of 2007’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) More than 1,000,000,000 people worldwide live on less than $1 per day, and another 1,600,000,000 people struggle to survive on less than $2 per day, according to the World Bank.

(2) At the United Nations Millennium Summit in 2000, the United States joined more than 180 other countries in committing to work toward goals to improve life for the world’s poorest people by 2015.

(3) The year 2007 marks the mid-point to the Millennium Development Goals deadline of 2015.

(4) The United Nations Millennium Development Goals include the goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, that live on less than $1 per day, cutting in half the proportion of people suffering from hunger and unable to access safe drinking water and sanitation, reducing child mortality by two-thirds, ensuring basic education for all children, and reversing the spread of HIV/AIDS and malaria, while sustaining the environment upon which human life depends.

(5) On March 22, 2002, President George W. Bush stated: `We fight against poverty because hope is an answer to terror. We fight against poverty because opportunity is a fundamental right to human dignity. We fight against poverty because faith requires it and conscience demands it. We fight against poverty with a growing conviction that major progress is within our reach.’.

(6) The 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States notes: `[A] world where some live in comfort and plenty, while half of the human race lives on less than $2 per day, is neither just nor stable. Including all of the world’s poor in an expanding circle of development and opportunity is a moral imperative and one of the top priorities of U.S. international policy.’.

(7) The 2006 National Security Strategy of the United States notes: `America’s national interests and moral values drive us in the same direction: to assist the world’s poor citizens and least developed nations and help integrate them into the global economy.’.

(8) The bipartisan Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States recommends: `A comprehensive United States strategy to counter terrorism should include economic policies that encourage development, more open societies, and opportunities for people to improve the lives of their families and enhance prospects for their children.’.

(9) At the summit of the Group of Eight (G-8) nations in July 2005, leaders from all eight participating countries committed to increase aid to Africa from the current $25,000,000,000 annually to $50,000,000,000 by 2010, and to cancel 100 percent of the debt obligations owed to the World Bank, African Development Bank, and International Monetary Fund by 18 of the world’s poorest nations.

(10) At the United Nations World Summit in September 2005, the United States joined more than 180 other governments in reiterating their commitment to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals by 2015.

(11) The United States has recognized the need for increased financial and technical assistance to countries burdened by extreme poverty, as well as the need for strengthened economic and trade opportunities for those countries, through significant initiatives in recent years, including the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (22 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 (22 U.S.C. 7601 et seq.), the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative, and trade preference programs for developing countries, such as the African Growth and Opportunity Act (19 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.).

(12) In January 2006, United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice initiated a restructuring of the United States foreign assistance program, including the creation of a Director of Foreign Assistance, who maintains authority over Department of State and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) foreign assistance funding and programs.

(13) In January 2007, the Department of State’s Office of the Director of Foreign Assistance added poverty reduction as an explicit, central component of the overall goal of United States foreign assistance. The official goal of United States foreign assistance is: `To help build and sustain democratic, well-governed states that respond to the needs of their people, reduce widespread poverty and conduct themselves responsibly in the international system.’.

(14) Economic growth and poverty reduction are more successful in countries that invest in the people, rule justly, and promote economic freedom. These principles have become the core of several development programs of the United States Government, such as the Millennium Challenge Account.

SEC. 3. DECLARATION OF POLICY.

It is the policy of the United States to promote the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

SEC. 4. REQUIREMENT TO DEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY.

(a) Strategy- The President, acting through the Secretary of State, and in consultation with the heads of other appropriate departments and agencies of the United States Government, international organizations, international financial institutions, the governments of developing and developed countries, United States and international nongovernmental organizations, civil society organizations, and other appropriate entities, shall develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

(b) Content- The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include specific and measurable goals, efforts to be undertaken, benchmarks, and timetables to achieve the objectives described in subsection (a).

© Components- The strategy required by subsection (a) should include the following components:

(1) Continued investment or involvement in existing United States initiatives related to international poverty reduction, such as the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 (22 U.S.C. 7601 et seq.), the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (22 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), and trade preference programs for developing countries, such as the African Growth and Opportunity Act (19 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.).

(2) Improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate.

(3) Enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate.

(4) Leveraging United States trade policy where possible to enhance economic development prospects for developing countries.

(5) Coordinating efforts and working in cooperation with developed and developing countries, international organizations, and international financial institutions.

(6) Mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses, United States and international nongovernmental organizations, civil society, and public-private partnerships.

(7) Coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other development goals, such as combating the spread of preventable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, increasing access to potable water and basic sanitation, reducing hunger and malnutrition, and improving access to and quality of education at all levels regardless of gender.

(8) Integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs.

(d) Reports-

(1) INITIAL REPORT-

(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the strategy required under subsection (a).

(B) CONTENT- The report required under subparagraph (A) shall include the following elements:

(i) A description of the strategy required under subsection (a).

(ii) An evaluation, to the extent possible, both proportionate and absolute, of the contributions provided by the United States and other national and international actors in achieving the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

(iii) An assessment of the overall progress toward achieving the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

(2) SUBSEQUENT REPORTS- Not later than December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2015, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees reports on the status of the implementation of the strategy, progress made in achieving the global poverty reduction objectives described in subsection (a), and any changes to the strategy since the date of the submission of the last report.

SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES- The term `appropriate congressional committees’ means–

(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

(2) EXTREME GLOBAL POVERTY- The term `extreme global poverty’ refers to the conditions in which individuals live on less than $1 per day, adjusted for purchasing power parity in 1993 United States dollars, according to World Bank statistics.

(3) GLOBAL POVERTY- The term `global poverty’ refers to the conditions in which individuals live on less than $2 per day, adjusted for purchasing power parity in 1993 United States dollars, according to World Bank statistics.

(4) MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS- The term `Millennium Development Goals’ means the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2 (2000).

Looks like hollow legislation. No real action I can see in it.


#6

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:

Looks like hollow legislation. No real action I can see in it.[/quote]

Building blocks is more like it.

mike


#7

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.


#8

[quote]Mick28 wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
“A nice-sounding bill called the “Global Poverty Act,” sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.”

“The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends.”

Obama is a pure elitist, draining the middle class of this country, to allegedly help the poor. No matter that the money would do little to help the poor but the money has to be forced out of the hard-working middle class of this country.

Maybe he could just send some of his or Pastor Wright’s millions over…the fucking dog shit elitist!!

I’m shocked, this is a horrific act. I wonder why I haven’t heard more of this from the main stream liberal media. Oh…yea…I guess I just answered my own question.

Good job HH.

[/quote]

I read the bill. It is not as described in HH’s post.

As Mike pointed out it could be used as a building block to justify spending more money for aid but the article in HH’s post appears to be beyond mere speculation and more fabrication.


#9

He likes to spend other peoples money on charity. He is not so inclined with his own apparently.

The elite must know better then us bitter people in Pennsylvania.


#10

The Great Society Program was such a success in this country that we hope to expand the program worldwide! Afterall, the Great Society Program made poverty drop from something like 15.6% to 15.5%, or some such similar number.


#11

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
I read the bill. It is not as described in HH’s post.

As Mike pointed out it could be used as a building block to justify spending more money for aid but the article in HH’s post appears to be beyond mere speculation and more fabrication.

[/quote]

Let’s see what he dude at the UN who runs this says: “A global tax on carbon-emitting fossil fuels might be the way to begin. Even a very small tax, less than that which is needed to correct humanity�??s climate-deforming overuse of fossile fuels, would finance a greatly enhanced supply of global public goods. No better time to start than as the new millennium begins.”

I hate poverty. But the way to eradicate it is to let productive people keep their money and come up with ideas. Taking money from them so libs can strut around proclaiming how moral they are, spending the looted money to help the poor (which never happens), is morally and practically wrong.


#12

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
The Great Society Program was such a success in this country that we hope to expand the program worldwide! Afterall, the Great Society Program made poverty drop from something like 15.6% to 15.5%, or some such similar number.[/quote]

And the bill is what, something on the order of $6 trillion dollars and counting? Yep, that was an excellent investment.


#13

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
I read the bill. It is not as described in HH’s post.

As Mike pointed out it could be used as a building block to justify spending more money for aid but the article in HH’s post appears to be beyond mere speculation and more fabrication.

Let’s see what he dude at the UN who runs this says: “A global tax on carbon-emitting fossil fuels might be the way to begin. Even a very small tax, less than that which is needed to correct humanity�??s climate-deforming overuse of fossile fuels, would finance a greatly enhanced supply of global public goods. No better time to start than as the new millennium begins.”

I hate poverty. But the way to eradicate it is to let productive people keep their money and come up with ideas. Taking money from them so libs can strut around proclaiming how moral they are, spending the looted money to help the poor (which never happens), is morally and practically wrong.
[/quote]

I don’t disagree with your sentiment but the bill in the Senate does not match the story or your link.


#14

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
I read the bill. It is not as described in HH’s post.

As Mike pointed out it could be used as a building block to justify spending more money for aid but the article in HH’s post appears to be beyond mere speculation and more fabrication.

Let’s see what he dude at the UN who runs this says: “A global tax on carbon-emitting fossil fuels might be the way to begin. Even a very small tax, less than that which is needed to correct humanity�??s climate-deforming overuse of fossile fuels, would finance a greatly enhanced supply of global public goods. No better time to start than as the new millennium begins.”

I hate poverty. But the way to eradicate it is to let productive people keep their money and come up with ideas. Taking money from them so libs can strut around proclaiming how moral they are, spending the looted money to help the poor (which never happens), is morally and practically wrong.

I don’t disagree with your sentiment but the bill in the Senate does not match the story or your link.

[/quote]

Where do you mean? Its his bill. He’s committing us to spend all that money. Sorry, am I missing something?

The President will be REQUIRED to implement this policy:

“To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”

As the MAN IN CHARGE says, this requires the tax he describes. I don’t see how this doesn’t match up.


#15

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
I read the bill. It is not as described in HH’s post.

As Mike pointed out it could be used as a building block to justify spending more money for aid but the article in HH’s post appears to be beyond mere speculation and more fabrication.

Let’s see what he dude at the UN who runs this says: “A global tax on carbon-emitting fossil fuels might be the way to begin. Even a very small tax, less than that which is needed to correct humanity�??s climate-deforming overuse of fossile fuels, would finance a greatly enhanced supply of global public goods. No better time to start than as the new millennium begins.”

I hate poverty. But the way to eradicate it is to let productive people keep their money and come up with ideas. Taking money from them so libs can strut around proclaiming how moral they are, spending the looted money to help the poor (which never happens), is morally and practically wrong.

I don’t disagree with your sentiment but the bill in the Senate does not match the story or your link.

Where do you mean? Its his bill. He’s committing us to spend all that money. Sorry, am I missing something?

The President will be REQUIRED to implement this policy:

“To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”

As the MAN IN CHARGE says, this requires the tax he describes. I don’t see how this doesn’t match up.

[/quote]

Are you serious? You really don’t understand this and think it forces the president to do this? It makes the president commission a study. It does not force him to raise taxes (impossible) or force spending.

I find the original article you posted extremely dishonest. There are plenty of reasons to dislike Obama. Pretending that this lightweight legislation is more than it is is a distraction.