No, the ad hominem is what you have done, and statements such as claiming that I wrote that you are a flaming idiot are untrue.
The intolerance I find is with you, regarding Beck saying that. You are clearly intolerant of his saying it.
I don’t find intolerance in Beck for having that opinion.
I went and watched the clip, now that you are getting more specific. You are surely not getting your alleged quote above from the clip. At least not remotely accurately.
It doesn’t help your case to make up things like your above supposed quote or near-quote (same as you’ve done repeatedly in what you claim I wrote, by the way.)
Beck said nothing about Obama being a SOB. He also appeared to correct himself immediately – which you omitted of course – that he meant white culture rather than white people as he first said (doesn’t move it away from being a stupid opinion but whether his opinion was stupid or not is irrelevant to the matter of your intolerance to opinions you disagree with being expressed) and also with further followup that he was not saying that Obama didn’t like white people, but nonetheless he was a racist.
Again, stupidity or incorrectness of Beck’s opinion isn’t the point. It’s your intolerance of it being expressed.
Your calling Beck intolerant doesn’t even follow. There’s nothing intolerant about his statements: it’s just that he doesn’t like Obama, obviously, and thinks him a racist. What, saying something negative about Obama now is categorized as “intolerant” ?
As an aside, the commentary from the MSNBC folk was ridiculous. One even insisted that Obama couldn’t be a racist because he’s half white. What a racist comment: analyzing a person’s race to figure out what his positions and feelings could or could not be!
As for complaining that it’s ironic that supposedly I’m insulting you while telling you you are intolerant (also, you misrepresent again and add in that supposedly I included “bastard” in what I told you of yourself): maybe you don’t even know what intolerant means. It certainly is appearing so.
As for your claiming I don’t “have a helpful place in the discussion,” this seems merely to be part of your pattern of opposing the expression of anything that you don’t agree with. You have been 100% consistent in that. If you don’t like someone’s opinion, it shouldn’t be expressed, and if it is expressed, why, then he’s “causing division!”
It’s clear you are not going to understand that when people express opinions, even stupid ones, that others disagree with and those people go postal about those opinions even being expressed, with great emotional outbursts such as yours and demands for silencing, what is creating any resulting division in society is not those differing opinions being held, not those differing opinions being expressed, but the rage and intolerance at their being expressed from people like yourself.
That rage and intolerance of others is the true source of the division, not the expression of the opinions.