Can someone just help me understand this really fast. (Thinking aloud here) Everyone ive talked to and what ive read has said that because of a shorter ester NPP is more potent than deca on a mg to mg basis. Now I also know that you will hold much less water on NPP (about 40-50% approx.) then deca because of the ester length.
Ive also read on these threads that ppl say tren a at say 350mgs per week would be the equivalent of 400mgs tren e, or something like that lol Everything ive seen with NPP however is at a much lower concentration than the deca I can find . Would it still be worth it to pin less Npp or Pin a higher dose of deca?
Ps I have already ran deca and i get little to no sides from it. These would be the cycles I was planning on doing given your responses. I dont really like pinning and would only be comfortable doing these amounts.
Again water retention isnt a problem and would obviously be more pronounced in cycle B. My only concern would be adding muscle tissue. Im currently sitting around 5ft 10in 220 lbs at around 13%bf.
Cycle A: Sust 875mgs per week, NPP 475.5 mgs per week,
Cycle B: Sust 875mgs per week, Deca 875 mgs per week (or slightly lower if I get sides but highly unlikely seeing as i ran 600mgs last run)