[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
A. At what point should limits be set on how many kids people can have?
B. Do you ever see it happening?
Obviously, I’m thinking most will say never to ‘A’, but just curious at what point can our country not support more people.
Also, for anyone that has ever complained about being stuck in traffic, if you answer “never”, you can no longer bitch about traffic ;)[/quote]
The rate of child-bearing today can’t provide enough tax-payers to keep up with entitlement spending, and you want to cut it more? And free markets aren’t healthy in a society of octogenarians ruling by demographic dominance, bending the backs of the few young (through the tyranny of the ballot box) to the task of somehow funding their newest joint replacement. How about trying not to live to be 100+ years old on the tax payers dime? We die, others replace us.
Is there some kind of emo fascination Westerners have with going the way of the dinosaur? Very well, go extinct. Those who’ll replace you will laugh at you.
[/quote]
Do you have a solution to offer? [/quote]
To what? A hypothetical crises that has been pushed back, pushed back, and pushed back? Folks, do a google search on the world population shrinking.[/quote]
To getting people in the west to have more kids?
[/quote]
One person at a time, put the traditional family back up on it’s exclusive pedestal.
[/quote]
How do you do that ?
[/quote]
Guys like me not letting go of the issue.
[/quote]
Sloth/Clinton 2016