Anybody who doesn't question the official 9/11 commission report is brain dead. There are plenty of questions that need to be addressed. In no order whatsoever here are just a few:
1) The official report doesn't even mention WTC 7. A few levels were on fire and it crashed to the ground at free fall speed. The NIST videos edit out the audio just before the building begins to collapse.
2) The crash sites at the pentagon and Shanksville look nothing like plane crashes. Look at pictures of every plane crash in aviation history. They are apples and oranges. Additionally, the security footage from surrounding buildings pointing directly at the crash site was taken immediately after the crash. The "plane" crashed into the part of the pentagon that was researching the $2.3 trillion missing dollars reported by the pentagon on 9/10. The hole in the pentagon was tiny, nowhere near the size of the plane that supposedly hit the building.
3) Put options placed on the 2 airlines involved in 9/11 weeks before the attack were several hundred times higher than normal. When a freedon of information act requested documents showing who made money from the put options, they were "destroyed". One bank was found to have profited from the attack, in Norway I believe. The ex president or CEO of the bank was high level CIA at the time of the attacks.
4) Research typical emergency response times for F-16s to be on site in America. I believe it is roughly 15 minutes. It took over an hour to sramble F-16s on 9/11. This can be blamed on the "war game" that was being conducted during the attacks that just so happened to involve planes being hijacked, thus creating ghost images on radar. Statements given by high level officials stated "Nobody ever conceived terrorists would hijack airliners and use them as weapons," but we later found out tests were conducted in years prior on that exact scenario.
I know I haven't been very specific. I urge you to do the research yourself. Until you do so, your opinion is garbage.
I watched a documentary on the events leading up to 9/11 over the weekend on the History channel. It went all the way back to the US providing weapons to Pakistan so they could fight the Russians. The stinger missiles we provided were the cause of the turn of the war due to the number of Russian helicopters being shot down. It was extremely informative an non biased in my opinion. It gave great insite on the reasons for the hatred these people have for us and how the regime is organized and how they came into power.
The list of questions without answers is lengthy. My personal stance is that the US wasn't directly responsible for the attacks, but vital information which could have prevented the attacks was ignored or destroyed. This isn't an accusation, it's an admitted fact. Why would our govt allow the events of 9/11? The Patriot Act and War for resources/commodities.
US intelligence was losing the battle of monitoring and investigating suspected terrorist cells within the US. The Ptriot Act gave them free range on tapping phones and other medium. We also had a need to invade Iraq and eventually Afghanistan. The exact plan to invade Iraq was put in place before 9/11. Anyone that says "our govt would never let over 3 thousand people die" needs to consider that thousands die in our streets every year.
Thousands die in Africa every day from hunger and preventable diseases. There is one unquestionable fact; Government acts in its own best interest, not that of the American people.