[quote]vroom wrote:
Nice, another “blame the victims” thread.
Maybe everybody living in tornado alley should be left to the wolves. Then, all the people on the west coast in earthquake zones should be thrown to the abyss as well. Then, everybody living anywhere along the Mississipi should be left to rot when it floods.
Who else can we disown? I’m sure there are risks and dangers everwhere. Oh, how could I forget, anyone living near a forest should be left for ashes when there are forest fires. Then, when we have dry seasons, farmers should be left in financial ruin.
Cool, we might be able to wash our hands of maybe 1/4 of the populace. Good plan![/quote]
Vroom–
If you were referring to me, its a mistake to take my post farther than what was intended, or for that matter, my statements exactly. Nobody is talking about blaming the victims or throwing people to the snow. Currently our federal gov & FEMA are giving $$$ to the victims, not much but $2000 will help and hopefully they will be able to find jobs and relocate sucessfully. I get flamed quick but all im really saying is questioning whether to rebuild in the same area just like the other posts. So forgive my defeatist attitude but i dont want my grandkids to read about the disaster(S) @ NO of the years of 2005, 2020 ,2025 ect. Its a rational decision to be made NOT an emotional one. It should either have funding to rebuild the city or not, or just parts of it if that makes more sense.
For anybody else that responded: Given the fact that the govmnt is helping out the evacuees and that the majority of them are able to relocate, & the fact that funds are pretty much wasted in the event of another catastrophic disaster, would it make sense to rebuild NO on its present area?