[quote]Professor X wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Velvet Revolver wrote:
This guy is jacked by hollywood standards.
I must be The Hulk by Hollywood standards.
Well there does seem to be an unspoken rule around here : Dont make the Prof angry!!
No, the unspoken rule is that Prof x must bitch about things he obviously doesn’t understand.
Acting ability does not lay in the muscles, and a smooth, tuxedo-wearing, gun totin spy is not supposed to look like the hulk.
Tell me Prof, do you get laid a lot in real life with the “Laides, I think you should bulk” attitude?
You are one dumbass little cunt. No one wrote in this thread that James Bond needs to be extremely muscular. I made a comment about a specific comment made and here you come running your mouth showing exactly what kind of an idiot you are.
I think I do well above average with women. Are there any other specifics you are dying to know about my sex life? What the fuck is a “laides”?[/quote]
A “laides” is a mistype. You still got the meaning, though. Very perceptive.
Get as worked up as you want, fatso (20 inch arms at 280 pounds? good god), the fact of the matter is some of you folks simply can’t come to terms with the fact that, for certain roles, very muscular isn’t the key.
The thread was started by someone saying that Craig is the most muscular Bond to date, by far. He is. The bandwagon followed with accusations of him being barely more muscular than a 6 year old girl, and thus, unfit for the role.
You drive the bandwagon, you take the heat.