You do realize that clinical trials are more than slightly important, right? What other effects a therapy has need to be figured out over time with a broad scope of cases to look at.
As usual, you canât answer so you donât. You have so many sophomoric strategies.
Yes, they were forced to take money. This is about as stupid as that militant hard-on Jeff Sessions saying that marijuana is only slightly less worse than heroin.
You support a system that doesnât produce stem cell treatments for spinal chord injuries.
You are an ideologically bankrupt derelict.
From your article: Cooperative banks have for long been the back bone of rural banking. Since their inception, they have been doing excellent work in the field of rural and cooperative banking.
âThey are non cooperatives under the camouflage of cooperatives.â
- Rama Reddy, President of Hyderabad based Cooperative Development Foundation.
Yeah, probably.
Public, usually deals with the government and private does not. Co-Ops are owned by the workers and sometimes patrons but generally operates distinctly away from the government and are fundamentally run different than private businesses.
Another deflection.
Again, I am not against co-ops. Why do you keep implying that I am against them?
And a companyâs practices should not include fraud. Therefore, a company that commits fraud is an evil entity operating under the camouflage of a company. Which means all companies are clean.
See how meaningless that quote you used to retort is?
Tell me, again, how is a co-op a âsystematic solutionâ when it can be abused in a multitude of ways as long as People are running it?
And stop deflecting.
But you wrote this when comparing co-ops to banks:
Did you just find out the actual definition of the âprivate sectorâ today? Tell me what other way this quote can be interpreted.
So you believe in private ownership of a legal entity which serves the function of engaging in voluntary trade within the free market separated from government participation?
To what extent should such entities be regulated if increased regulation proves to not have the effect of reducing illegal practices by any appreciable amount, but, instead, passes the burden on to legal ones in terms of increased costs, limiting freedom of trade and a loss of income to itâs members?
I literally just reposted them for the third time today you dense fuck.
Called it.
Plenty of studies and positive results on hundreds of millions of people with vaccines; yet, youâre anti-vaccine, dumbass.
Read what you wrote, but slowly and use your brain. The answer to my questions were probably answered by your questions. Iâve never encountered such stupidity in my life.
You donât know a god damn thing about business in general let alone the pharmaceutical business. Get the fuck outta here with this garbage.
Cool bro, deny facts. Not surprising for an alt left sheep like you.
You probably donât even know TARP was paid back in full plus interest.
Itâs amazing how little you know about anything.
Did you just find out the actual definition of the âprivate sectorâ today?
You know he googled âwhatâs the difference between the private and public sectorâ. I wouldnât be surprised if his answer was a direct, stolen, quote from somewhere.
Public, usually deals with the government and private does not.
Congratulations, you understand the difference on a 3rd grade level. Whatâs a government contractor?
Shh⊠now I have to tell him that a country I do business in has cabinet ministers in top positions within the largest co-ops and no one is going to vote them out because of the fear of the abuse of regulations already set in place and the loss of government support against competition.
I donât worship it. Iâm not a super fan of giant corporate entities. Iâm a main St guy & try to keep $$$ local. However as a entrepreneur I value free system. I donât thereâs a answer here. Economics is supply vs demand.
You believe because you work in some facet of the field you understand the business side of it. You clearly do not
Lol. I understand it far more clearly than you. You work in no part of it, were educated in no part of it, and do not possess the ability to comprehend it. You never worked in either the business or sciences aspect.
You do realize that clinical trials are more than slightly important, right? What other effects a therapy has need to be figured out over time with a broad scope of cases to look at.
Nope, he does not. He canât understand the studies heâs linked either.
Plenty of studies and positive results on hundreds of millions of people with vaccines; yet, youâre anti-vaccine, dumbass
Donât worry, as soon as stem cell treatment becomes normal heâll flip flop. Heâs a disestablishmentarian. He canât stand to support anything thatâs part of the establishment.
Whatâs truly amazing is that zero people to my knowledge, over the past 3+ years anyway, have said theyâre against the use of stem cells as a treatment.
Itâs mind boggling.
Inb4, âthen why has big pharm suppressed stem cell use in the US??? Profit at the expense of the public, derelict!â
Whatâs truly amazing is that zero people to my knowledge, over the past 3+ years anyway, have said theyâre against the use of stem cells as a treatment
I still canât believe Zep wonât tell me the names of the co ops he shops at. He couldnât have possibly just learned about the business model last weekâŠright?