[quote]flipcollar wrote:
A few things…
You’ve asked for input in a couple posts, but you’ve also indicated that you don’t intend to change anything. That confuses me a bit. I’m not really sure what you’re looking for in terms of advice.
I’d be willing to bet that most people here take issue with your pct plan. Cyco provided you with a quality thread he created detailing what probably should be done for pct. It’s backed by research, and the science indicates his suggestions are better than the taper method. I know Prisoner pretty much never posts here anymore…and he also blasts and cruises. If you intend to blast and cruise, then do whatever you want, but if you would like to achieve a full HTPA recovery, I would consider a different approach.
As far as the dose goes, I would personally use less than what you’ve proposed here, but I don’t think it’s that big of a deal. I ran Test E @750/week for my first cycle, and saw good results. That’s not far off from a gram.
I personally wouldn’t consider pinning everyday for my first cycle. That’s a lot, man. I don’t even like pinning twice a week. After you’ve been doing it for awhile, it’s not so fun. Hopefully you’re up for it mentally. If I were you, I would consider maybe having a vial of Test C or E on hand, in case you get a few weeks into this and decide that pinning everyday is not for you. Again, just something to think about.
You’ve been a bit vague about your goals with this cycle, other than suggesting that strength-to-bodyweight is important to you. I guess it doesn’t matter much, since this sort of cycle is well suited for both aesthetic enhancement and strength. But we like to know people’s goals on here . And it would be nice of you to provide your actual starting stats, or a picture. There was no need to get so defensive about your starting point. We all start somewhere. But if you end up with questions in the middle of this cycle, this information may become relevant.
Anyway, I think I covered everything I meant to. Best of luck.[/quote]
ya know, i wish P22 would stop by again sometime…
i thought he had some interesting ideas about stuff, but i really don’t get why the “stasis taper” was considered a good idea.
for those curious, it’s basically a taper from a high level down to a level closer to what your body normally produces (and i’m obviously paraphrasing here). except, it doesn’t stimulate production, at all. the taper simply presumes that your natural production will increase due to coming off a higher dose… basically, it “allows” your body to start producing again, if it so desires…
adding in an AI or SERM (or both) would make it more effective, but i guess it would also make that pretty pointless, too.