[quote]L-Dee wrote:
I recently discovered a sports facility where they have a glute ham bench.
My current gym membership lasts until the end of this month. This one doesnt have a glute ham bench so i do natural GHR eccentrics (not strong enough to do a full concentric rep without pushoff).
It takes about 20min for me to walk to my gym now. The other facility is in another part of town, and it takes about an hour to get there.
What I’m asking is, is a glute ham bench that much more better than natural GHRs that i should invest the time to go to the other facility and train?
Which one is harder to do, bench or natural?[/quote]
I am big advocate of GHR. I however, pretty much only like the old school GHR. GHR bench, or whatever are not as effective. This is coming from my xp, though, I know my body better than yours so just think about what I am saying, k?
There seems to be a secondary discussion here, about the “necessity” of GHR ( both kinds ). I agree you don’t have to GHR to get a “big” Squat/DL, but I think GHR deserves more cred than being just an “accessory” lift. Technically one does not have to even DL to raise the #/kilos on the movement. That’s not my style, but it is true nonetheless.
Here’s the deal dude; why would you go 1hr out of your way for one movement? I personally really like V-bar dipping stations, they are just a good as flat bench for your chest ( if performing the correct variations ). I am not going one full hour out of my day to get to a V-bar dipping station, when I could flat bench, or decline within minutes. Make sense?