Now I am not generalizing the whole population of natural bodybuilders here at all; so take no offense to what I am about to ask: Why do natural bodybuilder always seem to have small legs compared to the steroid using bodybuilder when in contest shape?
Right, the obvious is in the question steroids. But what I am trying to get at is, that when you look a at natural on a bulk they do have quite big bulk legs and can squat a huge amount " for a natural of course"; but when they seem to get ready for a contest all that leg muscle they bulit seem to disappear, and when comp comes they seem to only be slightly better off than when they stared bulking. If you look at a steroid user they seem have bulk legs even when in contest shape.
I no there is no comparison to the natural and steroid, but it dose make you think are naturals doing something wrong in there training for contest to not to keep optimal size on there legs maybe they do to high rep range, too much volume, too little volume, not enough weight or frequency; or is it just they a natural is predisposed to losing leg mass every time in contest shape.
I would like to here your comments and also, if you are a natural or no steroid user and have notice this.
p.s I do realize that a steroid user will up dosage to keep mass, but the result should be the same less calories, more chance of muscle loss, but why never their legs?