[quote]P-DOG wrote:
“You are always on point with scientific studies and proper information to back your shit up when people make claims about your ideas.”
Hahahahahaha, bro you need to venture out a little. Did you read todays article “sad but true stories?” That is a classic example of how relevant a lot of these studies are.
The fact is that every time this guy has entered into a debate with any knowledgeable person in the industry his ass has been handed to him. Do a search for some of the threads with him and bill, or him and swale.
If you did a little research on this guy I dont think youd feel the same about him.
Do you see any of the other writers here getting in pissing matches with forum vets all over the internet, getting ran off of discussion boards, or “recommending” products of companies of which he has personal ties? [/quote]
Llewellyn Declined to have a debate with me, several times. Several.
“SWALE” was removed from moderator status on the board he was a staff member on (where he feebly attempted to argue with me), because he was/is mentally unstable. He then (believe it or not) joined a board I am staff on, and asked for a staff position.
Handed my ass by them? Hardly. Frankly, there’s a reason I was declined a debate with Bill, and SWALE was removed from staff. Think about it.
Also, what companies do I have personal ties to? I write for several companies, which is the nature of being a freelance writer. The only nutritional supps I reccomend is Biotest, however.
With regards to Research Chems, I use AG-Guys…as for AAS, I typically don’t “reccomend” anyone, but I will say someone/something is good, and/or if I use a product from a particular person.
I don’t really see anything wrong with any of that, but then again, I answered all of this in my interview with Shugart.