These numbers are just to vaguely illustrate a point, 100% doesn’t mean I was at my genetic limit probably etc etc (though certainly not a noob)
Ok, lets say that natural training took me from 40% to 100% and I did a cycle 5 years ago that took me to 150%. A long period of illness took me down to 50% and I managed to finally train back up to 75%.
If I do another cycle, pretty much mirroring the original cycle, even though i’m at 75% at the start this time as opposed to 100% when I last did it, will I still get fairly close if not exactly to the same 150% (becasue, steroids)
Er, I hope that’s understandable haha.
Thanks guys.
I mean, even if you aren’t at the limit of your genetic potential I have
heard that steroids will still take you quite far past them even on a
basic first cycle! So I figure, the 25% difference in the two cycles
starting point, it would pretty much laugh at and do something crazy
even if it’s build 6lb of muscle in a week!