I wasn’t really considering using prohormomes until I started reading some of the results reported by people in this forum.
In any case, I am planning on going on multiple 2 week cycles of mag10. However, I am thinking of having really long gaps between these cycles…like maybe 6 months. Reason being that, I really want to try and maintain as much of the gains as I possibly can for a longer period of time. I dont want to shoot up with phenomenal gains and then loose a lot of those gains say a year from now…I also dont plan on using Tribex or M between cycles…I figure that I am giving my body enough time to recover naturally…morever I’d pretty much run out of cash with all the money I plan to spend on Mag10 bottles…
So what do you think Bill?...do you think I should go ahead with this kind of a plan...or is it too conservative?....like I said - I dont really care for quick phenomenal results...I'd rather have the gains spread out over period of a couple of years and then maintain them for even longer...
I am also very concerned about hair loss of any sort…I am only 22 but have experienced a little hairloss…nothing significant, but enough for me to be careful with androgens…The mag10 colums state “No Hairloss”, but can you rate possible hairloss on a scale of 1 to 10(10 being the worst)…My fear of hairloss is another reason I want to avoid long cycler. Also, should I continue to use propecia during the cycles?
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with your plan whatsoever. You’ll still enjoy a lot of advantage from MAG-10, and will also very definitely be having your yearly results very dependent on the quality and consistency of your non-androgen-supplemented off-time training and nutrition as well, which is a good thing.
Propecia (finasteride) would be pointless
during a MAG-10 cycle, since testosterone
levels aren’t being increased. And finasteride
works by blocking conversion of testosterone
to DHT, a process which isn’t an issue
in a MAG-10 cycle.
That’s not to say that MAG-10 is guaranteed
to have no adverse effect on your hair
when you have the genetics to lose
your hair. The 4-AD component has proven
unexpectedly mild – so much so that the
best we can tell, it actually has no effect
on the hair – but the A1-E component
should be assumed to be comparable to
other androgens of similar properties,
e.g. Primo. In other words, mild, but
not zero effect (though there is no
DHT effect.)