T Nation

Meet Bush's World Bank Nominee


Meet Bush’s World Bank Nominee - PNAC Member, Bilderberg Attendee, CFR Member, Trilateral Commission Member, NAFTA Architect and Enron Advisor.

President Bush’s reaction to the loss of close ally, ultra globalist and PNAC war hawk Paul Wolfowitz as President of the World Bank has been to nominate one of his best friends, closest allies and ultra globalist PNAC war hawks, Robert Zoellick for the position.

Zoellick is the Cr?me de la Cr?me of Washington’s elite. His wikipedia entry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Zoellick reveals him to be a globalist all rounder who has worked his way into the upper echelons of every shadowy body and organisation of thinkers and power-brokers you can think of.

Like Wolfowitz, Zoellick is a member of the hawkish neo-conservative think tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC) who pushed hard to invoke the notion that evil foreign enemies who hated America should be preemptively dealt with.

Zoellick and PNAC famously wrote a letter to former President Clinton asking him to go to war with Iraq in 1998,
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm and later in 2000 predicted a “catastrophic and catalyzing New Pearl Harbor like event” would help shape U.S. military interventionism in the middle east and allow for global domination for the next century.

Zoellick is also a member of the unelected policy makers and rampant globalization advocate groups the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. He is also a regular at the powerful global policy defining Bilderberg Group meetings, having attended in 1991, 2003 and 2006 and currently attending the 2007 Bilderberg meeting which begins today in Istanbul, Turkey.
http://www.danielestulin.com/?op=noticias¬icias=ver&id=318&idioma=en

Zoellick has served under Bush Sr as White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant to the President and also worked under Bush family lawyer and big oil playboy James Baker during his tenure as Secretary of State.

While serving in the Bush Sr. administration, Zoellick was also instrumental in sealing the NAFTA accord with Mexico, serving as a special assistant to Bush in his relations with President Salinas of Mexico who had serious reservations on the deal but was eventually strong armed into acceptance by constant pressure from Zoellick.

He was also instrumental in promoting the Central American Free Trade Agreement as U.S. Trade Representative between 2001 and 2005 and has consistently pushed the “free trade” agenda (i.e., legalized robbery and looting and the monopolization of the global economy).

Zoellick also played a key role in the U.S.-W.T.O. dispute against the European Union over genetically modified foods .
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EUY/is_9_9/ai_98655475
The move sought to force genetically modified crops and food on the EU, which would not otherwise accept them, or be slow to do so.

Zoellick also has key ties with the corporate elite having serving as an executive at Goldman Sachs and also as a paid consultant on the Enron advisory board , owning Enron shares worth between $15,000 and $50,000, which he sold before the energy giant went bankrupt.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/business/2002/enron/21c.stm
Zoellick also served on the boards of such corporations as Alliance Capital, Jones Intercable, Said Holdings, and the Precursor Group.

Currently Deputy Secretary of State Zoellick is expected to be ratified by the Bank’s board as the new President later this month after the formal nomination puppet theatre show procedure ends.

That’s that little problem over at the World Bank solved for the globalists then.

I’ve been reading from an actual insider, Dr. Carroll Quigley. He’s definitely not a nutjob and he really lays out how all this works. Here’s the wiki:

Defense Department consultant, Harvard Phd, on and on.

In a way, this reminds me of Plato’s Republic, where the philosopher-kings rule us. They hold mock elections now though instead of outright ruling us. The list of Presidents and Secretaries of State who are/were CFR and such is astounding.

Our country in trouble.

It really makes those who took down Wolfowitz pretty silly now. Didn’t serve much purpose, did it?

[quote]jlesk68 wrote:
…and later in 2000 predicted a “catastrophic and catalyzing New Pearl Harbor like event” would help shape U.S. military interventionism in the middle east and allow for global domination for the next century.
[/quote]

That’s false. Sorry to go off on a tangent here, but I’ve seen this claim before by 9-11 Ct’ers. Here, the article provides only part of a quote (omitting context), and fabricates the rest. In effect, presenting the quoted portion as if it were discussing the mid-east.

Here’s what the this article tells us. Note where the direct quote ends and the article substitutes it’s own words.

"…and later in 2000 predicted a “catastrophic and catalyzing New Pearl Harbor like event” would help shape U.S. military interventionism in the middle east and allow for global domination for the next century.

Now, here’s the real thing.
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-like a new Pearl Harbor”.

  1. It’s simply stating the obvious. The transformation (technological) would take a long time to implement. And, the obvious exception would be some event propelling the process at a faster rate. That’s not a diabolical slip up, just common sense.

  2. What does it mean by transformation? Well I already hinted at that in point 1. But, here is what the author of this article tells us PNAC was referring to: “…military interventionism in the middle east and allow for global domination for the next century.”

But, that’s false. The chopped up quote is pulled from a chapter discussing an information technology TRANSFORMATION Here is the exact wording, at the beginning of the same chapter, this article pulls the quote from.

[i]"To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts, and seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs.

Information technologies,in particular, are becoming more prevalent and significant components of modern military systems. These information technologies are having the same kind of transforming effects on military affairs as they are having in the larger world.

The effects of this military transformation will have profound implications for how wars are fought, what kinds of weapons will dominate the battlefield and, inevitably, which nations enjoy military preeminence".[/i]

ENRON advisor?!?!?!

Man, and here I was hoping he’d try and push Carly Fiorina through again!

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
I’ve been reading from an actual insider, Dr. Carroll Quigley. He’s definitely not a nutjob and he really lays out how all this works. Here’s the wiki:

Defense Department consultant, Harvard Phd, on and on.

In a way, this reminds me of Plato’s Republic, where the philosopher-kings rule us. They hold mock elections now though instead of outright ruling us. The list of Presidents and Secretaries of State who are/were CFR and such is astounding.

Our country in trouble.[/quote]

Have you read, “The Creature from Jekyll Island?”

You ought to, and then let me know what you think of it. I’m reading through it now. Can’t recommend any book more highly. It’s among the top three most informative/insightful books I’ve ever read. The person you referred to, Carroll Quigley, struck me as being familiar, and I believe it’s because his work is cited in that book.

http://www.amazon.com/Creature-Jekyll-Island-Federal-Reserve/dp/0912986212