Meditations, Musings & Muscular Contractions

Pec deck, 120kg, top set of 12
Single-arm Cross-body Pec Deck: 90kg for 7, then 95kg for 10
Reverse Pec Deck, 60kg for 10 then top set with 85kg for 10
Nautilus Machine OHP: 57kg for 7, then 71kg for 7, then 43kg for 9 (super slow)

Pec Deck went well, adding a rep on the single arm variant. The real big deal though is reverse pec deck because that was an all-time PR which I managed with 85kg for 10, very very good. Same performance on nautilus OHP.

Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers:14kg for 8, 18kg for 8, & 14kg for 8
Cable Lateral Raises: 5kg for 8, 7.5kg for 8, then 5kg for 10 (super slow)
V-bar Pushdowns: 30kg for 8, 37.5kg for 8, then 30kg for 11

Nothing special on skullcrushers but cable laterals went very well, hitting a PR, (remember I’m just standing straight up & the leverage is easier when you lean, which I did previously). Added a rep on pushdowns with 37.5kg, quite a big deal.

Machine Preacher Curls, 50kg for 8, 70kg for 8 reps, 50kg for 8 (super slow)
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls: 60kg for 9, 45kg for 8 (super slow)

Nice bicep workout, nothing revolutionary here.


Back & legs.
Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 6
Seated Leg Curls 110kg for 6 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row: 80kg for 8, 100kg for 9, 70kg for 10 (super slow)

Completely dropped a lat pulldown set due to recovery issues, just did my top set & walked away. Nothing new on leg curls, but nice to hit rows with 70kg for 10 super slow reps.

Hack squat: 100kg 8, 105kg 9, 100kg 8
Weighted Decline Crunch: 15kg for 8 (super slow)
Calf raises: 106kg for 12 reps (super slow)

Resetting my form on hack squats because I’m currently dipping above parallel. It’s not totally evil, it’s my natural ROM for my back to stay on the pad with my foot position as is. I put my feet much lower & focused more on knee flexion.

Happy to add a rep to weighted crunches. And happy to have added a whole pin level on the calf raises again, 12 reps.

Unfortunately not feeling too well these past 5 days. I’ve consumed an average of like 1800 calories a day for this time. Appetite really down, sweats. Felt a bit like a fever on Saturday but I’m close to normal now. Fortunately for all of these days except the Saturday, my protein timings & amounts have been good - focusing on keeping that up. So, this is basically an unscheduled cut. I’m just over 89kg, or I was, but after this little fever I’m down to just under 87kg - in the evening! Thank god I trained yesterday & today & my performance was still there. I felt a little flat but that’s expected with the lack of carbs.

Pec deck, 120kg, top set of 8
Single-arm Cross-body Pec Deck: 90kg for 7, then 95kg for 10
Reverse Pec Deck, 60kg for 10 then top set with 85kg for 9

Top set was 8 reps on pec deck because I brought the handles to a brief stop at the bottom of every rep. Single arm version kept up. Marginally down on reverse pec deck.

Nautilus Machine OHP: 57kg for 7, then 71kg for 8, then 43kg for 10 (super slow)

All-time PR on this one adding a rep to the top set & backoff set - fucking hilarious. How weird is this… Is my OHP recovery threshold stupidly low? Possibly. This workout was 2 days later than normally scheduled, so if any muscles were under-recovered previously, that was a chance for them to fix right up. Imagine if my calories had been at normal levels.

Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers:14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, & 14kg for 8
Cable Lateral Raises: 5kg for 8, 7.5kg for 6, then 5kg for 9 (super slow)
V-bar Pushdowns: 30kg for 8, 37.5kg for 9, then 30kg for 10

Cable laterals were a bit weak, but all tricep stuff went well considering no performance drop with the low calories & fever.

Machine Preacher Curls, 50kg for 8, 70kg for 9 reps, 50kg for 10 (super slow)
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls: 60kg for 9, 45kg for 8 (super slow)

All-time PR on preacher curls despite the fever & low calories… Wow. Another sign my biceps need super low volume? Perhaps.


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 7
Seated Leg Curls 110kg for 6 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row: 80kg for 8, 100kg for 9, 70kg for 10 (super slow)

Lat pulldown was ok. RPE was like 9.5 on the top set, couldn’t have done another but the number I did wasn’t 10 RPE. Same on leg curls as last time. Rows were, on reflection, slightly rough - I think if I’d filmed I’d see I wasn’t bringing the handles as far back as I could on my best day.

Hack Squat: 100kg 8, 110kg 11, 100kg 10
Weighted Decline Crunch: 15kg for 9 (super slow)
Calf raises: 115kg for 10 reps (super slow)

Hack Squats with reset form - already added 5kg & two reps to the top set. I’ll be up to 3 plates in no time. Felt it in my calves a bit because my foot position had my pushing from the front of my foot much more compared to my heavy weight-moving glute dominant foot position. Happy to add a rep to crunches despite the low calories. Upped the weight an entire pin on calves, too. I’ll stay here for a while.

Another 5 days of 1800 calories due to my appetite being quite low recently & me deciding to turn it into an impromptu cut. Evening weight 86.6kg 5 minutes ago, & before this cut, my evening weight was 89.9/90kg, so I’m down 3.3kg - but about a third of that is water & food. Still, it’s a substantial drop. I’m focusing on keeping my performance strong in the gym, considering the weight loss. I plan to stay in a deficit until Christmas, basically. Hopefully my appetite has come back by then & I can focus on gaining weight at a snail’s pace for the next 10 months.

Pec deck, 120kg, top set of 8
Single-arm Cross-body Pec Deck: 90kg for 7, then 95kg for 9
Reverse Pec Deck, 60kg for 10 then top set with 85kg for 9
Nautilus Machine OHP: 57kg for 7, then 71kg for 8, then 51kgkg for 7 (super slow)

Felt like shit today, which ironically made me feel NOT like shit about my performance being a touch weaker here & there. Must’ve been tired, I slept 14 hours that Saturday evening before this Sunday workout, (went to a wine festival during the day, go figure). Had a coffee & it made me sweat for like 45 minutes. In any case, a stunted performance while feeling like shit is good because you’ve got the illness to fall back on. A shitty performance when you’re at 100% means you’re losing muscle.

Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers:14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, & 14kg for 8
Cable Lateral Raises: 5kg for 8, 7.5kg for 8, then 5kg for 9 (super slow)
V-bar Pushdowns: 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 8, then 30kg for 10 (super slow)
Machine Preacher Curls, 50kg for 8, 70kg for 8, 50kg for 8 (super slow)
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls: 60kg for 7, 45kg for 8 (super slow)


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Seated Leg Curls 110kg for 6 90kg for 9
Seated Chest Supported Row: 80kg for 8, 100kg for 9, 70kg for 10 (super slow)

Lat pulldowns felt quite recovered, which is nice. Leg curls feeling heavy. Rows feeling relatively strong.

Hack Squat: 100kg 8, 110kg 12, 100kg 10
Weighted Decline Crunch: 15kg for 10 (super slow)
Calf raises: 115kg for 10 reps (super slow)

Hack squats with new form feeling good. Added a rep to weighted crunch (it’s somewhat of a bodyweight movement so no surprises here). Same performance on calves as last time.

Another 5 days in a deficit. Very weird, I’m not struggling with hunger at all despite 1800 calories a day of milk, protein bars, almonds & some type of meat in the evening. If I wanted to go kito I’d drop the milk but I don’t care about being in ketosis. Weight loss is all energy balance anyway, just gotta eat good foods & keep protein high. Gym performance is holding up, for now. Anyway, it’s only a couple more weeks of deficit to go & then it’s time for Xmas & a little diet break. I’m down another 0.5kg in the past 5 days, so far so good.

Pec deck, 120kg, top set of 9
Single-arm Cross-body Pec Deck: 90kg for 7, then 95kg for 9
Reverse Pec Deck, 60kg for 10 then top set with 85kg for 9
Nautilus Machine OHP: 57kg for 7, then 71kg for 8, then 51kg for 7 (super slow)
Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers:14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, & 14kg for 8
Cable Lateral Raises: 5kg for 8, 7.5kg for 8, then 5kg for 10 (super slow)
V-bar Pushdowns: 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 9, then 30kg for 9 (super slow)
Machine Preacher Curls, 50kg for 9, 70kg for 8, 50kg for 8 (super slow)
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls: 60kg for 8, 45kg for 8 (super slow)


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Seated Leg Curls 110kg for 6 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row: 80kg for 8, 100kg for 9, 70kg for 10 (super slow)
Hack Squat: 100kg 8, 115kg 11, 100kg 10
Weighted Decline Crunch: 15kg for 10 (super slow)
Calf raises: 115kg for 10 reps (super slow)

5 more days in a deficit since last post. Training is basically copy+pasting last time - which is ultimately good, keeping my strength in a substantial deficit is ideal. Couldn’t stick to the diet on Friday, work lunch & Christmas party took me out, but minimal damage, 2800 calories including alcohol.

The star trak pec deck machine was under repair, so I had to use a different branded one. Not ideal. I used a ‘Life Fitness’ brand, did pec deck with 105kg for 7, then cross body version with 84kg for 7, 9, I think - actually thought this was superior thanks due to the shape of the seat. Reverse pec deck on the same machine with 42kg for 12 then 56kg for top set of 12. Then, as below.

Nautilus Machine OHP: 57kg for 7, then 77kg for 6, then 51kg for 8 (super slow)
Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers:14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, & 14kg for 8
Cable Lateral Raises: 5kg for 8, 7.5kg for 7, then 5kg for 10 (super slow)
V-bar Pushdowns: 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 9, then 30kg for 9 (super slow)
Machine Preacher Curls, 50kg for 9, 70kg for 8, 50kg for 8 (super slow)
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls: 60kg for 8, 45kg for 8 (super slow)


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Seated Leg Curls 110kg for 6 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row: 80kg for 8, 100kg for 9, 70kg for 10 (super slow)
Hack Squat: 80kg 6, 7 75kg 7
Weighted Decline Crunch: 15kg for 8 (super slow)
Calf raises: 115kg for 9 reps (super slow)

Another 4-5 days in a deficit & I’m just above 85kg now. Strength hasn’t really dipped yet, so just happy to still be performing ok.

Pec Deck: 120kg for 9
Life Fitness Crossbody Pec Deck: 84kg for 7, 9
Life Fitness Reverse Pec Deck: 42kg for 12, 56kg for 12
Nautilus Machine OHP: 57kg for 7, 71kg for 8, 51kg for 8 (super slow)
Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers:14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, 14kg for 8
Cable Lateral Raises: 5kg for 8, 7.5kg for 5 (super slow) 5kg for 10 (super slow)

Tried cable laterals with slow rep speed on the top set & it felt pretty good, I think I’ll keep it up.

V-bar Pushdowns: 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 9, 30kg for 9 (super slow)
Machine Preacher Curls, 50kg for 9, 70kg for 8, 50kg for 8 (super slow)
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls: 60kg for 8, 45kg for 8 (super slow)


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Seated Leg Curls 110kg for 6 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row: 80kg for 8, 100kg for 9, 70kg for 10 (super slow)
Hack Squat: 80kg 6, 8 75kg 8
Weighted Decline Crunch: 15kg for 10 (super slow)
Calf raises: 115kg for 9 (super slow)

As you can see the weight is down on hack squats. I’ve found a way to position my foot so I can go ass to grass, & it feels great.

Just got back from family vacation. Essentially, I took one additional rest day beyond what I normally do, then trained, so barely a setback at all despite the vacation. I even maintained my weight which is a real solid outcome for the Christmas break & all the food & drink that comes with it. I wasn’t going to try to progress the cut over the Christmas break with my family. Christmas day was a surplus for sure.

Not gonna log the session because it’s the same stuff. I’ll just say I cable lateral raised 7.5kg with two seconds up & town tempo for 6 reps which seems like a great improvement. Top set of hack squats with two plates I managed for 9 reps, too. Now onto the rest of my post, (rant post).

Geoffrey Verity Schofield, a youtube fitness guy whose content I enjoy, put out a video a few days ago about the different types of lifters. Not ‘crossfitters, curlbros, IG girls, leg skippers’, this wasn’t one of those instagram reel videos. He put lifters into the boxes of racehorse, (lower volume responders), workhorse, (higher volume responders), donkeys, (don’t respond particularly well to either), & Unicorns, (can do whatever & make gains).

Unlike ‘somatotypes’, with eco/meso/endomorph, I think these classifications of Geoffrey are quite useful. I don’t really like the somatotypes much, for two reasons. Firstly, there’s not a tendency for people to fall into a particular category, but there’s a false implied promise that there is such a tendency. A minority of people might fall nearly perfectly into each, ‘type’, but ultimately most people will vaguely align with one more than the other two, but ultimately have traits that don’t fit into that box. There’s not necessarily a correlation between bone thickness, ribcage circumference, ankle, wrist, knee, hip & elbow bone size, metabolism, etc - i.e. everything that forms the particular somatotype. Not everybody will fit perfectly into one of Geoff’s four classifications too, but the difference is, he’s aware he’s just presenting a simplified model & doesn’t pretend otherwise.

Secondly, & more importantly: Because you can’t do anything with the somatotype information. You might be naturally thin, small bones, low muscle mass, AKA an ectomorph - but these factors don’t determine the training routine that will work for you - you can’t predict how much volume you’ll respond best to from bodyweight, skeletal structure & metabolism. People who preach somatotypes pedal the idea that you can, & it’s absolute utter charlatan bullshit. That’s why the whole concept turns me off, (even though there are people out there that you can point at & say ‘yep, he’s an endomorph’, & it’s a pretty good descriptive truth. The theory which somatotypes ultimately carry water for are totally baseless. For Geoff’s model, there IS actual utility to it. When you recognize that you can partially or generally fit a certain mould for volume tolerance & per-set stimulation, you can let go of trying to emulate certain people when you’re in that post-early intermediate phase when you’re slowly building your own training program based on what’s working & what’s not.

I approximately fit the mould of a racehorse. High volume just doesn’t do anything for me. The intensity is where it’s at. It helps that I like training like this. Geoff himself is more of a workhorse. In this way I can see what he does from the outside, & enjoy his content but not try to emulate his training volumes for myself because we’re not the same in the way that matters.

4 more days in a deficit. New years eve will probably be a write-off but until the evening I’ll just be consuming high protein low carb. Scale check now has me just below 85kg so getting down there. After new year’s I’ll continue to cut for another couple of weeks then return to a small surplus.

I won’t write all of my exercises sets & reps, just the highlights. Little strength drop on reverse pec deck, only did 85kg for 7. Also on V-bar pushdowns, 37.5kg for 8. That was yesterday. Today I kept up my performance on lat pulldowns, leg curls, seated rows, ab crunch, calf raise - & added a rep on hack squats, two plates a side, ATG, for 10 reps, a PR, I suspect thanks to neural CNS improvements at the exercise with this ROM.

Several more days mostly in a deficit. Summer holidays, (I’m in the southern hemisphere), around New Years are a stupid time to try to lose weight, but it is what it is, lol. My lifts are holding up, at least. Managed 105kg on the different pec deck (life fitness) for a set of 8, & graduated from 80kg to 90kg on ATG hack squats on my top set, hitting 8 reps. Training rant time.

I’m finding the return on investment on a single set of calf raises is amazing. Just starting the movement by sinking into the stretch at the bottom for like 4 seconds before starting the first concentric, followed by two seconds up, two seconds down, for maybe 10 reps, then sinking back into the stretched position for like 5 seconds post-failure, before finally getting off the machine & stumbling to the gym exit. I’m stimulating the calves & also getting tremendous work done as far as improving forward ankle mobility, while training. I’m a guy who’s normally only stretching to kill time while waiting for equipment, so this is big for me. I’ve done a bit of incline walking on the treadmill recently on days where social situations have got me going slightly over on the calories. Previously, doing the incline walks before I bothered training calves, I had to keep the incline a little more conservative because calf burn would make going at a steady state unsustainable, whereas now that I’ve started doing calf raises & quickly got them like 30% stronger thanks to local noob gains, that’s no longer a problem. Calves seem a little unique because I feel like the difference between a set which isn’t very good quality vs a quality set, is even higher on calf raises than most other exercises due to the stretch reflex being so pronounced for this movement. With precise & effortful execution, I can make one set go a long way on this.

Pec deck, 120kg for 9
Single-arm Cross-body Pec Deck (Life Fitness Machine): 84kg for 7, 9
Reverse Pec Deck (Life Fitness Machine): 42kg for 10, 56kg for 12
Nautilus Machine OHP: 57kg for 7, 71kg for 8, 50kg for 9 (Super Slow)

OHP in particular felt very strong considering the caloric deficit.

Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers:14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, & 14kg for 9
Cable Lateral Raises: 5kg for 6, 7.5kg for 6, then 5kg for 9
V-bar Pushdowns: 30kg for 8, 37.5kg for 9, then 30kg for 9

Actually added a rep to the backoff set on skullcrushers, & pushdown remaining strong despite the lower calories. Cable lateral raises holding firm. All sets of all these exercises are now done with two seconds up & down tempo.

Machine Preacher Curls, 50kg for 9, (regular speed), 55kg for 7 reps, 50kg for 7
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls: 50kg for 7, 45kg for 7

Finally bit the bullet on these two lifts & stopped doing my top set with 1 second up 1 second down tempo & embraced the 2 seconds up 2 seconds down tempo, (except for the warmup on the first curl). I feel very much safe going quite deep on these now due to the extra control & lower loads, & safety is number one.

Another few days in a deficit, hitting the same numbers as above. Weighed in at a new low 84.0kg this morning. Weight loss has been very slow in contrast to dropping from 89kg to 86kg which happened in about two weeks, which is in one way a negative, (because who doesn’t want to get ripped faster), but in another way, is a very positive indicator of something else. When we stray a long way from our ‘bodyweight setpoint’ there is some resistance to changing our bodyweight further. If I weighed 68kg like when I was 17, & bulked up to 89kg then cut, I’d lose about 8kg in 4 weeks probably without even trying very hard. After all, I’d weighed 68kg or less for my whole life prior & only been at this heavier weight for a few weeks - I’m a long way from home regarding my bodyweight setpoint. But bodyweight setpoint changes. The most extreme example would be IFBB bodybuilders - they struggle to ‘cut down’ to like 260 pounds at like 5’8 due to how much muscle they’ve built meaning that they can be shredded at this heavy a weight, & getting shredded is never easy. Essentially, this current struggle shows me that I’ve successfully altered my bodyweight setpoint, not only compared to several years ago, but even since one year ago.

One year ago I did a cut which finished at 81kg, fractionally leaner than I am right now. Now, I think I’m just 1kg of bodyfat away from that level, which will be a couple of kg heavier than last year. At this point, having built most of my muscle, 2kg of lean muscle tissue makes a very visually pleasing difference on the physique. In a way, with this added lean tissue, my 1800 calories a day right now are similar to if I’d gone 100 calories lower than this last year simply with the metabolic rate of muscle on the body & the calories it burns just from existing. Anyway, I started the cut because I didn’t have the appetite to continue gaining, but that’s certainly not the case at the moment.

RANT: The saying, ‘the truth is somewhere in the middle’ irks me on an emotional level because it sounds like centrist hogwash that comes from a very simple, (& wrong), place, intellectually. ‘Some people say 1, some people say 2, so the answer’s 1.5’. That’s it, that’s the depth of the thinking. Looking at this from the lense of any contentious issue, compare that approach to the better representatives of each respective side who follow a train of thought, ultimately with different underlying pre-suppositions & values which separate their conclusions from one another - the ‘middle’ approach does no further thought than approximately understanding the end position of both sides & planting their flag in between them. If two mathematicians are doing an advanced equation & come to two different answers, one may be right & the other will be wrong, but the person who gets both answers, adds them together & divides them by two will be wrong virtually every single time.

Now, ‘the truth is somewhere in the middle’, is actually often the case for debates about the amount/dosage/quantity of something - THAT’S when this cliche remark can frequently turn out to be in the ballpark of correct. We can be nearly sure that the answer is somewhere in between the lowest dosage group & the highest dosage group, (though sometimes one group is found to be so superior in result that we need to reassess entirely what ‘low’ & ‘high’ mean, & to run the experiment again using more well-selected quantities). Of course, this is using the ‘median’ trained lifter as the subject - since we all know there will always be those individuals who respond better to higher or lower volume, (though HIT advocates may sometimes not accept this), the ‘X volume is better for whom?’ question must be answered with, ‘the aggregate trained lifter’ if the debate is to even be had.

The criticism of high volume is quick - it requires the most work/sets. If low volume were somehow proven as effective, it basically wins since it’s more efficient. For high volume to win, there can be no tie, it has to be more effective to win, a tie only gives the win to low volume.

The low volume criticism is slightly lengthier - HIT practitioners are all about that one set. ‘More is not better’, they say. And yet, they do more - more effort! They train not only to failure, but often beyond, partner assisted reps, static holds, controlled negatives after positive failure - what is this but an additional stimulus akin to doing a second set? But they can’t do a second set because that goes against their religiously fundamental philosophy of single set training. A high, medium or even a non-HIT low-ish volume practitioner can easily say, ‘Hmm I’m well recovered between workouts but I don’t seem to be forcing any new adaptions, I will add one set in’, because usually they don’t have a philosophy built around that one set, unlike the HIT people. And if, just if, that single set with the forced reps & negative to exhaustion doesn’t quite force an adaption, they either have to no longer be officially HIT, or spin their wheels forever.

I’ve rambled enough. I’ll talk about my actual answer to the HIT vs Volume debate in another post later. Spoiler alert, it’s somewhat inclined to lower volumes.

Weight loss getting quite difficult around 84kg, (down 5kg from 89kg), but slowly but surely getting leaner. I need to make my food choices on point to make the cut easier. I’m big on protein bars for maximum convenience but for controlling appetite & getting a great micronutrient intake in my diet, some kind of meat with a few vegetables mixed in is number one. I just cooked 500g pork mince, adding one tin of tomatoes, one tin of red beans, (mostly carbs but very satiating), & 200g mixed veg, (carrots, beans & peas, 45 calories in 100g so why the hell not), for a couple of meals there. Strength is still ok. I managed two & 1/4 plates on hack squats ATG for 10 reps which is awesome. Final set of cable laterals with 5kg for 11 super slow reps which is good. Otherwise just consistent, holding onto my strength. I’ve decided, two more weeks of dieting before I tap out & shift into basically an incremental surplus to be sustained for many months.

Rant: Another low vs high volume rant. People love their tribe/party/camps, humans are tribal after all. But for any contentious topic which is an argument on quantity, how much of something, often the middle of the two offers the best option for the largest group of people. But with the volume camps, there’s an added complexity - the low volume people usually perform their sets with more effort than the high volume people. Speaking generally, it’s 100% true. This reality slightly favours lower volume training. It favours lower volume for two reasons, the first being just my subjective opinion - Why perform this high number of sets with this moderate level of intensity, when you could perform this lower number of sets with a high intensity? The honest answer by some will be that they prefer it - fair enough. For me personally a smaller number of brutal sets is much more exciting than set after set of low intensity training. The second reason, however, is an objective advantage on low volume training, explained below.

The number of sets we can recover from depends how hard we push them. RPE 10 might mean 10 sets a week is right, & RPE 7 on average might mean 18 sets is about right. The issue is this - you KNOW when you have reached RPE 10 in a way you will never know when you’ve reached RPE 6. The lower the intensity, the more guesswork is made on how hard you trained, & the more guesswork there is, the more potential for inaccuracy there is. You may have undershot it by a couple of reps, or overshot it by a couple of reps, & now the amount of volume you’ve determined to be right based on your average RPE being this certain figure is now off by a potentially significant factor. There is a certainty in higher intensity training that you don’t get as much of when you stay further away from failure.

Lifting is about self-discovery - finding the volumes/frequency/exercises that seem to work well for you. With that said, you don’t know what you don’t know, hence why novice & intermediate routines exist to be followed by people who don’t yet know what works best for them. All that a pre-existing routine written by someone else on the internet can be, is a ‘template routine’. Intended to be run as is, for a time, & then adjustments to be done by the person running it based on their individual needs. ‘Advanced’ programs which float around the internet, intended to be followed by others, as a general rule are stupid because when you are advanced, you should be doing your own routine. You do a couple of intermediate programs, reduce volume where you’re under-recovered & add it when you’re not getting enough stimulus, change exercises where you’re not feeling it, & slowly mix & match your way to the ‘ideal’ setup RE your stimulus & recovery needs. Your stimulus & recovery needs will also slowly adjust over time as you make progress & get older, so even when you’re where you need to be, part of the job is remaining vigilant to being ready to adjust when required.

For a template routine to be as good as possible, it needs to prescribe stuff, (volume, frequency, intensity, exercise selection), to benefit the greatest possible number of people. If it does that, it’s the perfect routine in the strict sense of what, ‘template routine’ means. There’s no promise of it working perfectly for everyone, that’s a dream. Working well for the greatest number of people, that’s perfection from a realistic standpoint. Anyway, I thought I’d write a few down below for my copy+pasting when required.

Push/Legs/Pull

Push
Bench Press 3X8
Incline DB Bench 3X10
Machine OHP 3X8
Reverse Pec Deck 3X12
Lying Tricep Extension 3X10
Lateral Raise 3X12
Tricep Pushdown 3X12

Legs
Squat 3X8
RDL 3X8
Hack Squat 3X10
Leg Curl 2X10
Calf Raise 3X10
Weighted Crunch 1X10

Pull
Pulldown 4X8
Chest Supported Row4X10
Shrug 2X12
Preacher Curl 3X10
Hammer Curl 3X10

There we go, just a basic template PPL. No trying to manage recovery with conventional deadlifts or barbell rows, the lower back loading is all on leg day, simple as. Run 6 days a week its weekly volume is 12 sets of chest, quads, biceps, triceps, 10 sets of hamstrings,18 sets of shoulders, 20 sets of back. This is quintessential moderate volume that will tick the boxes for an absolute shitload of early intermediates. A novice could run this, but why? A full body routine with 5 exercises every second or third day is plenty of stimulus for them. It’s actually less volume than a lot of ‘rate my PPL’ threads I see where they’re doing 4 chest exercises, two OHP movements, 4 tricep exercises, ETC. Here’s the same volume, (roughly), on a couple different setups.

Arnold Split

Chest & Back
Bench Press 3X8
Pulldown 4X8
Incline DB Bench 3X10
Chest Supported Row4X10
Pec Deck 2X12
Shrug 2X12

Legs
Squat 3X8
RDL 3X8
Hack Squat 3X10
Leg Curl 2X10
Calf Raise 3X10
Weighted Crunch 1X10

Shoulders & Arms
Machine OHP 3X8
Reverse Pec Deck 3X12
Lying Tricep Extension 3X10
Lateral Raise 3X12
Tricep Pushdown 3X12
Preacher Curl 3X10
Hammer Curl 3X10

Upper/Lower Variant - Biceps on Lower Day

Upper

Bench Press 3X8
Pulldown 4X8
Machine OHP 3X8
Chest Supported Row 4X10
Pec Deck 3X10
Reverse Pec Deck 3X12
Lying Tricep Extension 3X10
Lateral Raise 3X12
Tricep Pushdown 3X12
Shrug 2X12

Lower & Biceps

Squat 3X8
RDL 3X8
Hack Squat 3X10
Preacher Curl 3X10
Leg Curl 2X10
Hammer Curl 3X10
Calf Raise 3X10
Weighted Crunch 1X10

Now this is more volume than I do, but I already know I’m a low volume type. I’m a racehorse, not a workhorse. If I were to write a quintessential high intensity program, I’d probably write something similar to DC Training but slightly higher volume, & I stress the word slightly. I think if something like the below were really popular, you’d possibly maybe have literally half of early to late intermediates getting on this & absolutely thriving on it to the point that they end up training like this for the rest of their lives, (with a little variation obviously), so long as the irrational need to simply be in the gym more overtakes their rational mind & ruins a good thing.

[High Intensity Routine]

Performed three days a week on non-consecutive days, alternating A & B workouts.

-All exercises to be performed with two second concentrics & eccentrics - 4 seconds per rep. Don’t be concerned with hitting the concentric tempo on your final reps if they take longer than 2 seconds, but otherwise, stick with this. Take an eccentric longer than 2 seconds on large ROM exercises if you feel it’s useful for keeping your form tight.
-Exercise selection based on movements with greatest difficulty around mid-point as these are the most effective exercises for hypertrophy.

All exercises are trained with two sets.
-The first set is an ‘acclimation set’ done with about 10% less weight than the top set, with the same, or slightly fewer, number of reps. You should feel that you had about three more reps left in the tank before reaching muscular failure.
-The second set is your top set - an intense all-out set followed by two ‘rest-pause’ sets, each one performed after about 30 seconds rest. For example: After performing a set with 180lb for 9, you move to your working set weight of 200 pounds, for 10 reps, followed by two rest-pause sets of 4 & 3 reps. The rule around completing reps: If you know you can perform another rep, do it. If you’re certain you can’t, don’t. If you’re unsure, attempt it.

Workout A - Chest, Shoulders & Arms

Chest Press Movement: 1X8-12 RP**
Seated OHP Movement: 1X8-12 RP**
Pec Deck: 1X8-12 RP**
Reverse Pec Deck: 1X8-12 RP**
Cable Lateral Raise: 1X8-12 RP**
Lying Tri Extension: 1X8-12 RP**
Supinated Curl Movement: 1X8-12 RP**
Tricep Pushdown: 1X8-12 RP**
Hammer Curl Movement: 1X8-12 RP**

Workout B - Legs & Back

Vertical Pull: 1X8-12 RP**
Seated Leg Curl: 1X8-12 RP**
Horizontal Pull: 1X8-12 RP**
Hack Squat: 1X8-12 RP**
RDL: 1X8-12 RP**
Shrug: 1X8-12 RP**
Calf Raise: 1X8-12 RP**
Weighted Crunch: 1X8-12 RP**

1 Like

Another few days in a deficit & still holding strong. One of my chain gyms is very close to my office so I can train during lunch at work, (1 hour lunch). I think it’s quite a testament to my not screwing around in the gym from a time standpoint. Only difference is the oldschool OHP machine I like isn’t there, & the seated leg curl fucking sucks so I’m on lying leg curl.

Pec Deck: 120kg for 9
Crossbody Pec Deck: 85kg for 8, 95kg for 9
Reverse Pec Deck: 60kg for 10, 85kg for 10
Startrak OHP: 50kg for 7, 60kg for 7, 45kg for 8 (super slow)
Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers (SS):14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, 14kg for 9
Cable Lateral Raises (SS): 5kg for 6, 7.5kg for 5, 5kg for 10
V-bar Pushdowns (SS): 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 9, 30kg for 9
Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 6, 55kg for 9, 50kg for 8
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 7, 45kg for 7

Notice my preacher curl (now done super slow) I’m hitting 55kg for 9 on the top set, feeling good about this. Even added a rep to my backoff set on dumbbell skullcrushers.


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Lying Leg Curls (SS): 65kg for 10, 55kg 10
Seated Chest Supported Row (SS): 80kg for 8, 85kg for 9, 70kg for 10

Finally taken the plunge & doing all my chest supported row sets with two seconds up & two seconds down. 85kg for 9 on the top set as you can see. Also glad to still be hitting 110kg for 8 on overhand pulldowns considering it’s gone from 123.6% of my bodyweight to 132.5% of my bodyweight. This is still done explosively for now.

Hack Squat: 80kg for 7, 95kg for 8, 80kg for 9
Weighted Decline Crunch (SS): 20kg for 6
Calf raises (SS): 95kg 8 (different machine)

RANT: I need to talk about rest-pause. It’s one of the advanced techniques, along with partials, assisted reps, dropsets, etc. But I think ultimately it’s the most different to all the others, because of all of these techniques, rest-pause is the closest one of these options to simply doing another set. That’s kind of what it is, just with very short rest to hit those struggle reps straight away. HIT advocates who are like religious fundamentalists with their single set training are very cheeky to utilize this when they do because you just want to lean towards them and say, ‘You know you’re basically doing a second set, right?’

Anyway, I’ve got a theory that they’re very under-utilized among most people, (maybe myself too, I’ll think about it). Bodybuilding success is all about discovering the ‘goldilocks’ training zone for your stimulus/recovery needs, running with it, & adjusting as needed. Adding or removing a whole set can be a big step towards finding your ‘zone’ but when you’re working somewhat relatively close to the ballpark of what you should be doing, but you need marginally more, or marginally less stimulus, rest-pause is right there.

Ultimately a rest-pause set is LESS STIMULATIVE than a set taken to failure after a standard rest period. The first reps of a set might not be as stimulating as the last but there is still a stimulative effect that exists within them. Resting two minutes & doing 10 reps is a greater stimulus than resting 25 seconds & doing 3. Here’s what we do with this truth: Use rest-pause as a way to micro adjust our workouts. If you’re doing 3 sets & realize you need quite a bit more, or quite a bit less, then do 4 sets, or 2 sets. But if you’re doing 3 sets & you feel you’re very close to your ideal stimulus, but say you need slightly more, or slightly less, than rest-pause is right there. Add a rest-pause set after your final set. Or, remove one of your regular sets & add a rest-pause set. It’s a lilypad you can leap to in-between the adjustments of adding or removing an entire set. For this reason it is really really useful.

1 Like

A few more days in a deficit. I went to a beer festival yesterday so absolute writeoff from a cuting standpoint. Ate pretty wisely around it though. Protein shake at about 7AM & at about 10AM, 250g chicken with some mixed vege & black beans so was on about 650 calories at this point before the festival at 11AM. Had half a hotdog & a little beef quesadilla & that was it for food for the day, otherwise just had 7-8 beers, 250ml each, so would’ve been in the high 2000s but also lots of walking around too. Just copy+pasting the below from the workouts prior but editing a couple of things because I’m glad to say I’ve managed to add a rep in a couple places.

Pec Deck: 120kg for 9
Crossbody Pec Deck: 85kg for 8, 95kg for 10
Reverse Pec Deck: 60kg for 10, 85kg for 10
Startrak OHP: 50kg for 7, 60kg for 7, 45kg for 9 (super slow)

On OHP on the top set I actually forgot to change the weight so did 1 rep with 50kg & then 7 more with 60kg, nice. Added a rep to the super slow set too, going from 8 to 9.

Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers (SS):14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, 14kg for 9
Cable Lateral Raises (SS): 5kg for 6, 7.5kg for 6, 5kg for 12
V-bar Pushdowns (SS): 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 9, 30kg for 9
Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 6, 55kg for 10, 50kg for 8
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 7, 45kg for 7

Observe the PR on cable lateral raises & on machine preacher curls top set, feels good.


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Seated Leg Curls (SS): 110kg for 6, 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row (SS): 80kg for 8, 85kg for 9, 70kg for 10

Done in the gym not close to my work on a non-work day so back to seated leg curls, went great as I actually tried a 7th rep whereas for the past several workouts 6 reps was completely maximal. Maybe there’s something to the lying leg curls…

Hack Squat: 80kg for 7, 95kg for 9, 80kg for 9
Weighted Decline Crunch (SS): 20kg for 7
Calf raises (SS): 115kg 10

Somehow added a rep on hack squats, 95kg for 9 on the top set, ATG. Also weighted decline crunches, 7 reps with a 20kg plate at top of my head height. Nice.

RANT: I’ve got a theory around the reason why single set training isn’t quite optimal for a lot of people, (apart from effort required in the set). When we contract our muscles under load, tiny structures in the muscle cell called actin & myosin come together in an overlapping fashion & these repeated overlappings from each rep performed signal growth to occur. The strongest growth signal occurs when they actin & myosin overlap the right amount. If you are doing 1/4 reps on squats, they actin & myosin in your quadriceps will only overlap a small amount. And on the flipside, if you perform a tricep kickback, where all the tension is in the shortened position, the actin & myosin overlap too much - they bunch up, overlapping too far, resulting in a weakened growth signal.

We want exercises done with a tension curve which emphasises the midpoint of the lift in the muscle’s ROM, because these exercises cause actin/myosin overlap to the right degree, (fully overlapping, but at the same time without squishing/bunching up, to signal the strongest growth stimulus). This is also why we anecdotally see people get big at what seems to be a relatively efficient pace using exercises which might not fully shorten the muscle, (notice how 95% of chest exercises don’t have the arm come across the body further than the midpoint yet people still build big pecs) - because they’re doing movements which stress the muscle at it’s midpoint, where roughly ideal actin myosin overlap occur.

Remember that it’s about getting the right overlap, but also about this overlap occurring multiple times, for optimizing muscle growth. This is why static holds aren’t as good for hypertrophy as actually performing reps, even if you perform the static hold at a muscle’s midpoint, because while it’s good you’re holding in this position, you’re still only getting one overlap per set, like performing one super slow rep.

I’m putting forward that there is a minimum threshold of the number of times that actin myosin cross over in a training session for optimal growth signals to be triggered. Of course, for an untrained lifter, once could theoretically be enough, since static holds can definitely build muscle in untrained people. But as you advance, that number goes up. It’s one reason why HIT doesn’t tell people to do 5 reps, because even with superslow reps which can make those 5 reps take as long as 15 regular speed reps, they STILL usually recommend 8-12. This could only be because there is something gained in the process of a muscle going from lengthened to shortened under load a certain number of times. If time under tension was all that mattered, then very low rep sets with very very very slow cadences wouldn’t be shunned, but they are, & the reason for that is that a certain number of actin/myosin overlappings trigger the strongest growth signal.

Now it’s speculation time. I put forward, just casually & without evidence, that like roughly maybe 16-20 overlappings for a muscle is a number for causing that growth signal at any level of development, for a lot of people. That’s a couple of very high intensity sets. That’s why some don’t do too well from single set training even with a high level of intensity - the overlappings aren’t sufficient.

Look at DC Training - it’s usually a single set followed by two rest-pause sets which brings your reps per muscle group per workout slightly lower than the high teens/low 20s number I threw out, (except on rows, squats & RDLs, which are done for two sets). As per the revolutionaryprogramdesign website which has the DC writeup, ‘For example, your target might be 11-15 RP or 20-30 RP. For most body parts Dante recommends shooting for 11-15 RP.’. Anecdotally, DC Training is just slightly too low volume for many who tried it, (it’s fine for some, obviously), & you can see that for most body parts, they’re getting 11-15 reps, with a few body parts getting more. I happen to think it’s very close to being something that would absolutely be near-optimal for a huge swarth of people with just slightly higher volume. That’s why the High Intensity Routine I wrote up is basically DC volume but with one set prior to the top set, done to about RPE 7. It puts the number of reps per muscle into that high teens number, minimum, so ticks the box under this theory.

Also look at Dorian Yates. He would do a warmup set before his working set, but it was really a ‘feeler’ set, arguably a work set to some. If his top set was 200kg for 8, he was doing 180kg for about 7 a few minutes before. We’ve got this set contributing to the volume combined with the actual top set itself, so with 3-5 exercises for 2 sets per exercise, it actually mirrors a lot of the UK bodybuilding style of training currently popular & working for many, partially thanks to UK bodybuilder Jordan Peters & his trainedbyJP website - though a lot of that tends to favor a top set then backoff set style as the way of doing those two sets, but that’s into the minutia.

1 Like

Went to a social event on Friday but had far too much to drink, (easier to do when I’ve dropped weight, had few calories that day & have a few additional shots). I was sick so the additional calories are largely nullified. I was meant to train Saturday but ended up skipping it & doing it today, (Sunday). Had very little food on Saturday too, only ate at 5PM, some double cheeseburgers & an oreo mcflurry from mcdonalds. Trained Sunday & it actually went pretty well. Despite all indication that my performance would essentially be punished for my drinking & missing protein feedings the next day, I take one extra day of rest & my body continues to truck along. Also, I weighed in at a new low, just below 82kg - probably due in part to slight dehydration with this summer heat.

Pec Deck: 120kg for 9
Crossbody Pec Deck: 85kg for 8, 95kg for 10
Reverse Pec Deck: 60kg for 10, 85kg for 10
Nautilus OHP: 57kg for 7, 71kg for 8, 50kg for 9 (super slow)

On my preferred OHP machine, still holding strong.

Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers (SS):14kg for 8, 18kg for 9, 14kg for 9
Cable Lateral Raises (SS): 5kg for 6, 7.5kg for 6, 5kg for 12
V-bar Pushdowns (SS): 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 9, 30kg for 10

I need to say three things about cable lateral raises. First, I seem to be trucking along fine with two sets. Hitting that first set with 5kg for 6 & then doing it again after my heavy set for 12 really shows that this first 5kg set is basically a warmup. That’s not a bad thing, just an observation. Secondly, I’m switching my tempo on this from 2/2 to 2/3 as in two seconds up, three seconds down. Now, this includes a very brief pause at the bottom in the stretched position with my arm across my body. I think that will be beneficial. Thirdly, I’m dropping the rest-time after my heavy set before my final set because I’m doing a shitload of reps on that last set & I want to drop them slightly, (this exercise can only be loaded in 2.5kg increments so I’m slightly stuck on the loads, otherwise I’d do 5.5kg or 6kg on the last set). I dropped from 90 to 60 seconds rest today & may drop further going forward. Don’t forget I’m resting my shoulder when I train the other side too, so it’s not really that short rest since I’m not counting this too. Also, did one more rep than I’ve recently done on pushdowns, nice.

Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 6, 55kg for 9, 50kg for 8
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 7, 45kg for 7

Machine preacher curls from 10 to 9, but this particular gym’s preacher curl is marginally harder as I’ve experienced many times, so it’s nothing to fret.


First pic uploaded onto this website. This is an honest pic of where I’m currently at. Sitting down, (gets the love handles popping unless you’re pretty lean), & in natural overcast lighting without any overhead lighting. No pump, no flexing. 6’1, now down to 181lb. I didn’t think I had this much fat to lose at 196lb but I guess I did lol. I plan to continue cutting until it gets hard, as in I feel like shit, losing strength, energy levels dropping, libido down. Right now I actually feel really good thanks to the nutritious food I’m eating plus a couple of supplements & plenty of water. I imagine I will finish this cut in two weeks but we shall see.


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Seated Leg Curls (SS): 110kg for 6, 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row (SS): 80kg for 8, 85kg for 10, 70kg for 10

On widish grip pulldowns, not so much now but earlier on, I was doing marginally too much to quite recover from, in part from my brutal 2/2 tempo 90kg backdown set, causing me to revert the tempo back to 1/1 on this. I’ve made a slight further adjustment & am resting shorter between the 110kg for 8 & my backoff set with 90kg. The idea is essentially that a set done with less rest is marginally less stimulative than a set done with longer rest if the effort is equal. It’s why if you’re very close to your ideal volume at 3 sets of an exercise, but just need a tiny, tiny bit more stimulation, instead of jumping up to 4 sets, a 33% increase, (well slightly less than 33% because if you’re working hard, each set degrades little by little), you might add a rest-pause set, basically an additional set but with maybe 25 seconds rest. I’m making a smaller downward jump by going from 2 to 1 minute rest on pulldowns. Leg curls holding onto my strength. Seated rows a sickening PR, 85kg for 10 reps with 2/2 tempo! I must say these are one of the greatest exercises to perform slowly.

Hack Squat: 80kg for 7, 95kg for 9, 80kg for 9
Weighted Decline Crunch (SS): 20kg for 7
Calf raises (SS): 126kg 9

Little victory on calf raises, going to a new weight on this machine, (the one close to home I frequent on non-work days), going up 11kg & only hitting 1 fewer rep than the previous weight on the stack. 2/2 tempo, set commencing after a 3-4 second hold at the bottom, & finishing after another 6 second hold at the bottom too.

2 Likes

Weighed in at 81.9kg this morning, a new low. Still managing to hold onto my strength in the gym. Pec deck, reverse pec deck, OHP, skullcrushers, cable laterals, pushdowns, preacher curls & preacher hammer curls all held strong. On pull day, I tried a new weight on lying leg curls, 70kg for 8, then 60kg for 8, (2/2 tempo). Slight adjustment on machine rows - doing the first set, (the warmup/acclimation set), with a 2/2 tempo as well - so it was 75kg for 6, then 85kg for 10, then 70kg for 10. Pulldowns, hack squats, weighted crunches, all holding on. I did calf raises on the alternative machine with 95kg for 9 which is a PR on this machine, too.

RANT: You can tell people how many sets & reps to do, but intensity of effort is harder to lay out for people to follow. Part of the reason why different people’s training responses sometimes seem so far apart from each other is that it’s driven by differing intensities of effort per set. The average low volume lifter pushes their average set harder than the average high volume lifter.

When you give training advice to people, (unless it’s a biomechanical question, or a question around how to order the training split), then the conversation is under-pinned by the assumption of a certain level of training intensity being applied, by necessity. You can’t prescribe volume in a vacuum. It has to be accounting for the level that each set of that volume is pushed to. The same volume recommendation at 8 reps left in the tank is a whole world away from that recommendation with each set to failure. And a slightly higher volume at a slightly lower intensity of effort can produce equal results to a slightly lower volume at a slightly higher intensity. The volume, intensity & frequency are like numbers that are multiplied together. Your ‘perfect stimulus’ might be 125 ‘stimulus points’, achieved by these three things being at a 5 out of 10, (5X5X5 = 125). You might lower one of these to a 4 or 3 & increase the other to a 6 or 7 & get to a fundamentally similar place. But if you lower any one variable too much, i.e. 5X1X10, (= 50), i.e. training a muscle once a fortnight doing a failure set then passively flexing against the load for 45 seconds after you’ve reached failure, you’ll have likely pushed one variable too high at the expense of pushing another too low, & you’ll be in an unproductive place. But that’s an extreme example. So long as we’re being reasonable, then within a rational limit, volume, frequency & intensity of effort are variables which we can trade between & still achieve a fundamentally productive training stimulus.

Following from this, my personal training philosophy, for hypertrophy movements, is that it makes sense to push an exercise to as close to being unable to perform any more reps as is practical & safe to do so on at least one set of it, (& from there, you do as many sets as it takes to grow, whatever that may be). I’m talking about hypertrophy oriented lifts. Powerlifting or Oly lifting is another story. But for stimulating a muscle, on a safe exercise, you could leave 3 reps in the tank on your hardest set & do an extra set, but… why?

Now, here’s my point: You give lower volume/higher intensity advice to people & a few of them will not make very good gains for the reason that they didn’t train close enough to failure - & here’s the kicker - I don’t really care about them. If you go to the gym & the hardest set of an exercise intended for muscle growth, (not powerlifts or oly lifts), has you leaving multiple reps in the tank on a regular basis, I don’t give a single shit if a consequence of lowish volume/highish intensity training getting really popular means that you’re one of the people negatively affected by this because you take the advice & it doesn’t work well for you.

Let me be clear: Recommend the amount of volume & frequency that tends to work well for the greatest number of people when they apply the effort they’re supposed to. I don’t really want to help people that don’t train hard on a set. People that make threads online asking for advice but who won’t stick out a set for another 10 seconds because it hurts when they still had reps in the tank on a machine row, or a leg curl, or a hack squat. Give the advice that works when you train hard & let these people fall to the wayside. When I started lifting, doing as many reps as possible was the most natural thing for me. Problem was, a lot of the advice I got RE volume was influenced by that volume being credible ‘thanks’ to people who didn’t push each set hard. I want to help young guys who instinctively train close to failure because I see myself in them. It’s not a matter of wanting to sabotage people who are too much of a pussy to do as many reps as possible regularly. It’s a matter of helping the people who deserve to be helped & letting the chips fall where they may for the people who are too lazy & stupid to benefit from the advice.

Thought I’d upload a proper picture. Cut is trucking along, leanness is starting to come through. Probably weighed 82kg when this picture was taken, (6’1). Reasonably happy at the ‘balance’ to my physique currently, speaking just for this particular pose. It’s funny, normally what seems to happen is someone lifts, makes gains, gets more advanced & then they move into this phase of bringing up this muscle or that muscle, but for me I feel like my back, shoulders, arms & lower body are on a similar level. Lower back is quite undeveloped but that’s entirely the fault of my apathy & laziness, so I deserve what I get there.

Weighed in at a new low of 81.2kg this morning, & still feeling good. I think a lot of my success in maintaining my lifts on this cut, (aside from good food choices i.e. meat, eggs, milk & vegetables), has been training volume which works well for me, (i.e. lower volume). This is very important whether dieting or gaining, obviously. But some people do unnecessary amounts of volume, & when they switch from bulking to cutting, it can cause problems. Don’t get me wrong, that 1000 daily calorie drop doesn’t change their weekly recoverable volume by like 50%, it’s a relatively small change, but often these guys are on the brink, on the cliff, just being able to handle all they’re throwing at their body, & going from gaining to dieting is like a straw on a camel’s back. Well, actually it’s like a 30kg backpack on the back of a camel that can carry 250kg.

As you can tell by reading this, I’m trying to express the idea that dieting does affect your recovery, but only a little bit, (excluding competition leanness). I don’t want to propagate any sort of idea that you can’t train hard while dieting, or that you need to halve your sets. Usually an extra off day once every couple of weeks does the job. Recovery is NOT linear to your calories. Your optimal training on 3000 calories is NOT twice as much as on 1500 calories, more like 10% more. Anyway…

Pec Deck: 120kg for 9
Crossbody Pec Deck: 85kg for 8, 100kg for 9
Reverse Pec Deck: 60kg for 10, 85kg for 10
Startrak OHP: 50kg for 7, 60kg for 7, 45kg for 9 (super slow)

Pec deck not only holding on but actually getting slightly stronger - hitting up 100kg on my single arm variant for the first time for a top set of 9 reps with each arm, good stuff! Reverse pec deck & seated OHP holding onto my strength.

Dumbbell Incline Skullcrushers (SS):16kg for 8, 18kg for 9, 14kg for 9
Cable Lateral Raises (SS): 5kg for 6, 7.5kg for 7, 5kg for 12

On DB skullcrushers, both of the 14kg dumbbells were in use so I used 16kg for the acclimation set, & still did fine on the top set with 18kg & the backoff with 14kg. I shortened my rest period on cable laterals after the heavy set before the backoff set, (due to not wanting to hit too many reps on the backoff set - remember each rep takes 5 seconds), from originally 90 seconds rest, down to 45 seconds, & still hit 12 reps, very solid! I might need to drop further.

V-bar Pushdowns (SS): 30kg for 9, 37.5kg for 9, 30kg for 9
Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 6, 55kg for 10, 50kg for 8
Hammer-grip Machine Preacher Curls (SS): 50kg for 7, 45kg for 7

Keeping on keeping on. Might think about changing my pushdown variant some time in the future…


Widish Grip Pulldowns: 100kg for 8, 110kg for 8, 90kg for 8
Seated Leg Curls (SS): 110kg for 6, 90kg for 10
Seated Chest Supported Row (SS): 75kg for 6, 90kg for 8, 75kg for 8

The backoff set on pulldowns with 90kg is after only a minute rest but still feeling good. 110kg for 8 is pretty good now that it’s 136% of my bodyweight pretty much. Leg curls, strength just holding on. Chest supported rows, I upped the weight! Remember it’s 2/2 tempo on these now, an 8 rep set is a 32 second endeavour of pure flexion, (not counting any pausing between any reps, not that I even do that), which as far as hypertrophy goes, is pretty good. Some people’s 8 rep sets take 12 seconds total which IMO is a mistake.

Hack Squat: 80kg for 7, 100kg for 8, 80kg for 10
Weighted Decline Crunch (SS): 20kg for 7
Calf raises (SS): 126kg 10

Great victory on hack squats. Happy to say I’m now doing two & a half wheels on these with just absolutely quad-shredding ass to grass form & 3 second negatives. And another victory on calf raises - up to 126kg, the next pin down on the stack, for a full set of 10 reps!

Haven’t posted in a couple of weeks but cut is progressing along, down to 79.6kg morning weight. Energy levels still generally ok, just hitting the same gym numbers as above.

I need to restructure things a bit. A 2 on 2 off routine means I could hit the gym on any day of the week. I want to go on Tuesdays & Thursdays because there’s something I need to be at, (starting the week after next), which starts two hours after work, (work & this thing are on the west side of town & I’m on the east).

My volume is already low so I don’t really want to try & reduce rest days & thus also reduce sets. My best option is probably switching to training 3 days a week in A/B/A, B/A/B fashion, frequency of once every 4.66 days. 4 was going pretty good & it’s looking to go a little lower. Might add volume slightly, or maybe I’ll leave it the same. Maybe I’ll progress a little & I’ll need that extra 15% recovery time after all. Still thinking about post-cut training changes. This time around, there’s little to change as I seem to have found something that aligns with my recovery needs. Maybe a couple of small things.