[quote]David Barr wrote:
I’d still like to know what these “toxins” are. Would storage in muscle be safer than having them float around in our blood and induce renal stress?[/quote]
I’d like to know too. My personal belief is its part physiological misinterpretation, part DOMS, and part patient feeling.
[quote]David Barr wrote:
OT-Literally all of the data I have read show that massage, regardless of type, does not increase muscle blood flow. I found it hard to believe at first, but the volume of evidence is overwhelming. (I really don’t think that this diminishes the benefits of massage BTW). [/quote]
Which is why I actually said “a change in blood flow”. But the data on this topic seems conflicting though.
Do you read French Dave? I have a bunch of pretty cool study on this, but their all in French. Believe it or not, manual therapy is one area where France is way ahead of North America, and they investigated this.
The vasodilatation in arteries isn’t very present, and harder to evaluate. This is for the same reason massage is less effective on arteries: major blood vessels are too deep in the limbs and body for that.
Its another story for veins though. Massage has been proven to help veinous return, which would account for the “draining” effect. Exactly what is drained has yet to be identified.