You didn’t answer my question in full. I asked if you deserve to burn along with society considering you’re part of it. You said it should burn, not I. [/quote]
In short, I wont.
I am a heterosexual, white man which is almost a synonym for a net contributor.
I dont need that shit, they need it.
If it all breaks down, I come out ahead.[/quote]
So after the breakdown we will be left with a world of white males. Well, then what happens? The end of mankind? Seriously. [/quote]
No, we will just shift society a little in the direction that men have a little bit more power in the non zero sum game that is gender relations so that it is actually worth it for men.
Women will have to sacrifice, they have overplayed their hand. [/quote]
You mentioned society, which I took as society at large. Now you are saying all of society except white males will burn. This means no women, which would result in the end of mankind.
Are you now implying that all non-whites and all women should be punished because of some feminists and mean-spirit and overambitious and overly opportunistic and grasping women?
If you feel this way, that’s fine. I am not trying to start trouble. You just have some VERY unique thoughts.
In this case I will refer you to Girl writes What?, emphasis mine:
I officially recognize The Red Pill’s right to exist?
Frankly, I don’t mind the red pill (either the philosophy, or the subreddit). I think it has value to offer men who are looking for individualistic solutions to the current social problems re gender. I like Jack Donovan. I like Roosh V. I like Barbarossaaaa and Stardusk. I like all kinds of men and their perspectives, even when I don’t agree with everything they have to say. I like the idea of criticizing women (men too) and holding them accountable.
You’ll notice in my comment, I said “yes, women”. This debacle of a gender war is not just on the minority of women who are feminists–it’s on most women who’ve not just tolerated it, but viewed the social and legal changes the way looters view a race riot. Sure, they might not care about the issues, but they’ll happily take advantage of the measures feminists have managed to enact, or to ignore the way those measures unjustly harm men until the moment they feel personally victimized through the men they care about. The average woman will be 100% in favor of child support right up until her own kids have to go without figure skating lessons so her husband can make child support payments to his ex for kids he’s never allowed to see. They’ll collectively cheer the “advance” of women in education right up until their daughters can’t find a man worth marrying. They’ll laud efforts to make “rapists” more easily convicted until the unforeseen day their own son is falsely accused.
And she’ll nod along when all men throughout history are unjustly maligned as oppressors and rapists because she’s never, for whatever reason, realized that among the maligned is her beloved grandfather who taught her how to make daisy chains, encouraged her to climb that tree when she was little, started a college fund for her, and sat unsleeping next to her grandmother’s deathbed for 72 hours with tears pouring down his face. For some reason, she just never made the connection that when feminists were talking about evil, patriarchal rape-machines, they were also talking about the men she loves and the men who sacrificed so she could have a better life than they did.
If the red pill is a response to anything, it’s a response to the apathetic, pragmatic, mercenary nature of most women, who don’t even notice the harm done to men until they’re forced to personally suffer a portion of it.
And then this question in the OP, so typical. Okay, so women have been kicking you guys in the testicles for 50 years and you’re finally starting to object to it in ways that affect me personally. So what should we women do?
Well, first thing would be to stop kicking men in the testicles, and try to convince other women to stop. Second thing would be to stop interpreting “OW! My testicles! Fucking hell, WTF?” as misogyny and aggression. Third would be to stop buying the trite rhetoric of a Cenk Uygur, and a Theodore Roosevelt, and a William Blackstone, which derides men of past generations as behaving abominably toward their women, as fact, rather than as a way to distinguish themselves as superior to “those bad men over there, or back then”. Fourth would be to put a little bit of effort into understanding the male experience rather than judging it.
Red pill seems to be the one area that demands these things of women in general.
Plus, its not like we will devolve back into the stone age, life will just become hard enough for strongindependentwomenwhodontneednoman so that she rethinks her whole attitude.
You want me to build and maintain a civilization?
Fucking pay me.