T Nation

Low FSH, Normal LH, Normal Free T

Hello,

Age: 24

This are my results from the last bloodwork done

SHBG: 23.18 nmol/L (14.5-48.40 nmol/L)

Total T: 466.10 ng/dl (244-836 ng/dl)

Free T: 117.14 pg/ml (38-183 pg/ml)

FSH: 1.43 mUI/ml (1.5-12.4 mUI/ml)

LH: 5.70 mUI/ml (1.4-7.7 mUI/ml)

E2: 36.6 pg/ml (11.3-43.2 pg/ml) **** I dont know if this can be trusted because I live in Brazil and I dont think they test sensitive estradiol****

You can see my old labs in this post New Guy. Low SHBG, High E2

What concerns me is that my FSH tested low on all bloodworks done, always around 1-1.5 mUI/ml. Strange enough my LH always tested normal, the lowest being 3.66 mUI/ml, but KSman has said that LH levels tend to change through the day and FSH are better indicative of LH levels so Im worried that maybe the HPTA axis may be compromised.

Im suffering fron anxiety and depression since puberty, Im taking SNRIs right now and it has decresed my libido. Before taking the meds my libido was not so much abnormal but had difficult keeping erections and getting hard sometimes, very few espontaneous erections.

I was thinking about doing the HPTA restart protocol to see if things get any better, what are your thoughts? Do I run the risk of overestimulating the LH receptors?

Bump

Any input guys?

The ECLIA test (aka immunoassay or IA) for E2 management is commonly used for those on TRT. It is not an incorrect test or a test for women, but simply one way to check estradiol levels. The other commonly utilized test is the LC/MS/MS method (aka liquid chromatography dual mass spectrometry, sensitive or ultrasensitive). It is the more expensive of the two. There are inherent advantages and disadvantages to each of these two methods. I have been fortunate to be able to speak with professionals who work with both methods. One is a PhD researcher for Pfizer and the other is a medical doctor at Quest. I’ll summarize their comments.

The ECLIA method is the more reliable of the two in terms of consistent results. The equipment is easier to operate thus accuracy is less reliant on the skill of the operator. If the same sample were to be tested twenty times, there would be very little, if any, difference in the results.

The ECLIA method is not as “sensitive” in that it will not pick up E2 levels below 15pg/mL. If your E2 level with this test is 1-14pg/mL, the reported result will be “<15”. Because of this, it is not recommended for menopausal women, men in whom very low levels of E2 are suspected, or children. In other words, if your levels are below 15pg/mL, and it is important to know if the level is 1 or 14pg/mL, you do not want this test. For us, this is likely moot, since if you are experiencing low E2 symptoms and your test comes back at <15, you have your answer. For a woman being treated with anti-estrogen therapy for breast cancer, it may be necessary to know if the E2 level is zero or fourteen because therapeutically, they want zero estrogen.

A disadvantage to IA testing is that it may pick up other steroid metabolites, which in men would be very low levels, but still could alter the result. Another potential disadvantage is that elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) may elevate the result. CRP is elevated in serious infections, cancer, auto-immune diseases, like rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatoid diseases, cardiovascular disease and morbid obesity. Even birth control pills could increase CRP. A normal CRP level is 0-5 to 10mg/L. In the referenced illnesses, CRP can go over 100, or even over 200mg/L. Unless battling one of these serious conditions, CRP interference is unlikely.

The LC/MS/MS method will pick up lower E2 levels and would be indicated in menopausal women and some men if very low E2 levels are suspected and it is desired to know exactly how low, children and the previously mentioned women on anti-estrogen therapy. It will not be influenced by elevated CRP levels or other steroid metabolites.

While some may believe the ECLIA test is for women, on the contrary, as it pertains to women on anti-estrogen therapy, such as breast cancer patients, the LC/MS/MS is the test for women as CRP levels are a consideration and it is necessary to know if the treatment has achieved an estrogen level of zero.
On the other side of the coin, LC/MS/MS equipment is “temperamental” (as stated by the PhD who operates both) and results are more likely to be inconsistent. Because of this, researchers will often run the same sample multiple times.

It is not clear if FDA approval is significant, but this appears on Quest’s lab reports: This test was developed, and its analytical performance characteristics have been determined by Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano. It has not been cleared or approved by FDA. This assay has been validated pursuant to the CLIA regulations and is used for clinical purposes. This statement is on LabCorp’s results: This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by LabCorp. It has not been cleared by the Food and Drug Administration.

It is unlikely that any difference in the same sample run through both methods will be clinically significant. Estradiol must be evaluated, and it should be checked initially and ongoing after starting TRT. It obviously makes sense to use the same method throughout. Most important are previous history and symptoms related to low or high E2. Those are correlated with before and after lab results. Any estradiol management should not be utilized without symptoms confirmed by lab results.

Given your symptoms, I would try something. Some are symptomatic with even mid range free test, get them to high range, or even higher, and they are much better. I would try hCG over Clomid, but I would not rule it out. The SNRI may be difficult to overcome, even if you eventually end up on testosterone.

Good luck. Too young to be dealing with this.

You should think about what assays are being used especially if your free T is calculated.

It’s common for low SHBG guys to have depression and anxiety, so many processes are compromised.

Your prior TSH levels are indicating a thyroid problem, thyroid can still be sluggish and not show any problems, low Free T3 would lower SHBG.

Thank you for the clarification on E2 tests.

I think I will try the HPTA restart and see what happens. Assuming the LH levels tests are correct and in mid range, do I run the risk of overestimulating the receptors if I use clomid as detailed in the HPTA restart thread? Also do i run the risk of raising E2 to high on the tests of LH goes high?

The free T is serum tested.

One of my TSH tests were taken a week after iodine protocol so I think it was wrong. The last came up at 1.8

At the time, the iodine raised my temps, but know I don’t usually get 37°C and even then the morning temps where low, 35.6°C~. The last free T3 test came within mid range (3.8). I always use iodized salt.

Usually, the doc would order the labs and then the calculated free T is reported instead of equilibrium dialysis with LC MS/MS. If the conventional older algorithms are used, it may be erroneous. Being discussed at another post:

Hope for an accurate method to determine Free Testosterone](https://www.excelmale.com/forum/threads/hope-for-an-accurate-method-to-determine-free-testosterone.15209/#post-146675

Novel Algorithm for Free testosterone Determination ABSTRACT - the current methods for the determination of free testosterone- equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration, tracer analog methods, and the use of algorithms based on the…

Try the public free testosterone calculator at tru-t.org
https://tru-t.org/

I fail to see why this is being hyped by anyone. It’s a sales pitch for someone’s new lab test, the reference doesn’t prove anything. It should have a sticker on it about not being evaluated by the FDA and being available in payments of $19.99 on QVC.

1 Like

Not in the short term.

It’s possible.