Tin Can wrote:
I hope this dosen’t come off the wrong way, but I was expecting a different answer. First of all people who are after big gains know that libido can be a probelem and there are always ways around that. And athletes failing drug tests? I don’t think that concerns most the people using the product. Sorry but that seems like an odd reason to take the product off the shelves. I mean guys use gear all the time and come accross all kinds of problems and continue with their cycles and even go back on!
I did notice that the product would often cause white patches on my skin like maybe not being absorbed, but that’s because there was some overlap with the spraying I think. It would just kinda flake off.
I still find it very stange…
It was unfair of me to expect Cy to talk about something that was essentially a business decision.
Nandrosol and Androsol were manufactured for us by a quirkly little company near San Diego.
We told them what we needed done, and they pretty much engineered a machine to do it. The machine was plagued by problems. It even caught on fire once. Lines got clogged all the time. They hated making it and they were often way behind the production schedule. The workers who made it had to dress like HazMat guys.
Even so, Nandrsol, being sort of a weak sister to Androsol, wasn’t very popular. It was used mainly by guys who were overly paranoid about side effects. Androsol, however, sold well.
After a while, we never placed any more orders for Nandrosol.
In the meantime, we were working on MAG-10, and when Bill Roberts and Tim succeeded, we moved entirely in that direction and phased out Androsol entirely.
MAG-10 was just plain vastly superior (not to mention that Androsol was a pain to make).
Fair enough, thanks TC for the answer, now tell me who is bodybuilder X? (Just kidding)