T Nation

Liberals Refuse to Talk to Israelis

Who would have thought Liberals are anti-Semitic?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/21/george-galloway-debate-israeli-oxford

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Who would have thought Liberals are anti-Semitic?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/21/george-galloway-debate-israeli-oxford[/quote]

It’s ok to be racist towards Israel, didn’t anybody tell you?

/sarcasm

Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

He reps a UK party.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Sufiandy , you are wrong , the concept that all liberals are anti semites is a more appealing notion to the So Called Conservative Party

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.[/quote]

I am no liberal I how ever find the Republican Party To be more culpable than the Democratic Party. This board never questions the ignorance of the Republicans but climbs right up the arse of the Democrats for shit like this

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.[/quote]

I am no liberal I how ever find the Republican Party To be more culpable than the Democratic Party. This board never questions the ignorance of the Republicans but climbs right up the arse of the Democrats for shit like this
[/quote]

Just like the majority of the media never questions the ignorance of the Democrats and climbs right up the ass of the Republicans for shit like this.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.[/quote]

I am no liberal I how ever find the Republican Party To be more culpable than the Democratic Party. This board never questions the ignorance of the Republicans but climbs right up the arse of the Democrats for shit like this
[/quote]

Just like the majority of the media never questions the ignorance of the Democrats and climbs right up the ass of the Republicans for shit like this.[/quote]

The Democrats are guilty of mis and dis information but the Republicans take it to a rediculous level . Example Obama is a socialist he is the most dangerous liberal ever . WTF he is probably more conservative than Bush

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.[/quote]

I am no liberal I how ever find the Republican Party To be more culpable than the Democratic Party. This board never questions the ignorance of the Republicans but climbs right up the arse of the Democrats for shit like this
[/quote]

Just like the majority of the media never questions the ignorance of the Democrats and climbs right up the ass of the Republicans for shit like this.[/quote]

The Democrats are guilty of mis and dis information but the Republicans take it to a rediculous level . Example Obama is a socialist he is the most dangerous liberal ever . WTF he is probably more conservative than Bush
[/quote]

It’s not the Dem’s that do the mis and dis information…they let the media do it for them…and not blogs and such (where you are getting the Obama is a socalist stuff) but the major networks.

See the difference?

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.[/quote]

I am no liberal I how ever find the Republican Party To be more culpable than the Democratic Party. This board never questions the ignorance of the Republicans but climbs right up the arse of the Democrats for shit like this
[/quote]

Just like the majority of the media never questions the ignorance of the Democrats and climbs right up the ass of the Republicans for shit like this.[/quote]

The Democrats are guilty of mis and dis information but the Republicans take it to a rediculous level . Example Obama is a socialist he is the most dangerous liberal ever . WTF he is probably more conservative than Bush
[/quote]

It’s not the Dem’s that do the mis and dis information…they let the media do it for them…and not blogs and such (where you are getting the Obama is a socalist stuff) but the major networks.

See the difference?[/quote]

in my opinion more people agree with the Democrat’s agenda than do with the Republican’s agenda

In my opinion the Democrats allow some one to disagree with them , The Republicans call a Republican that disagrees with party line as RINO

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.[/quote]

I am no liberal I how ever find the Republican Party To be more culpable than the Democratic Party. This board never questions the ignorance of the Republicans but climbs right up the arse of the Democrats for shit like this
[/quote]

Just like the majority of the media never questions the ignorance of the Democrats and climbs right up the ass of the Republicans for shit like this.[/quote]

The Democrats are guilty of mis and dis information but the Republicans take it to a rediculous level . Example Obama is a socialist he is the most dangerous liberal ever . WTF he is probably more conservative than Bush
[/quote]

It’s not the Dem’s that do the mis and dis information…they let the media do it for them…and not blogs and such (where you are getting the Obama is a socalist stuff) but the major networks.

See the difference?[/quote]

in my opinion more people agree with the Democrat’s agenda than do with the Republican’s agenda

In my opinion the Democrats allow some one to disagree with them , The Republicans call a Republican that disagrees with party line as RINO
[/quote]

As opposed to Dem’s who call a black person voting GOP an Uncle Tom?

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Title is misleading, shouldn’t it say “1 guy refuses to talk to Israelis”.[/quote]

Ummmmmm he is a MP… a Minister of Parlement.

That’s not some guy off the street.

Would you say the same if Nanci Pelosi said it?[/quote]

So when some conservative politician says something stupid, does it represent his parties view or just his? And no I would just say “1 woman…”[/quote]

Not the same, one conservative politician made a ignorant rape comment during the election and all of a sudden the whole party thinks the same way, according to the media. Even Romney had to apologize for it, even though he had nothing to do with it.

[/quote]

You have to look at the party as a whole I can produce instance after instance where the Republican party wants to control all kinds of aspects of marriage , birth control , reproduction and the list goes on and yes rape also
[/quote]

Which the media LOVES to show every instance in graphic detail (I personally do not agree with many of the above GOP viewpoints).

But if a left leaning politician made the same statements (for instance oh…let’s say…rep. jesse jackson jr, off the top of my head) the media just looks the other way.

To deny this pitt, is deliberate ignorance.[/quote]

I am no liberal I how ever find the Republican Party To be more culpable than the Democratic Party. This board never questions the ignorance of the Republicans but climbs right up the arse of the Democrats for shit like this
[/quote]

Just like the majority of the media never questions the ignorance of the Democrats and climbs right up the ass of the Republicans for shit like this.[/quote]

The Democrats are guilty of mis and dis information but the Republicans take it to a rediculous level . Example Obama is a socialist he is the most dangerous liberal ever . WTF he is probably more conservative than Bush
[/quote]

It’s not the Dem’s that do the mis and dis information…they let the media do it for them…and not blogs and such (where you are getting the Obama is a socalist stuff) but the major networks.

See the difference?[/quote]

in my opinion more people agree with the Democrat’s agenda than do with the Republican’s agenda

In my opinion the Democrats allow some one to disagree with them , The Republicans call a Republican that disagrees with party line as RINO
[/quote]

As opposed to Dem’s who call a black person voting GOP an Uncle Tom?[/quote]

you know that may be a fair criticism , I how ever do not agree. I will bring up the name Chuck Hagel

I can honestly say I would not blame him for changing parties , not because his views are more Republican but because the Democrats allow him to disagree.

Le sigh

  1. this… http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/31/chuck-hagel-was-bad-and-it-doesnt-matter/

  2. this… http://freebeacon.com/report-hagel-said-state-department-controlled-by-israel/

And the majority of the GOP is going to vote for his confirmation.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Le sigh

  1. this… http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/31/chuck-hagel-was-bad-and-it-doesnt-matter/

  2. this… http://freebeacon.com/report-hagel-said-state-department-controlled-by-israel/

And the majority of the GOP is going to vote for his confirmation. [/quote]

They should , what else can I say