When you guys start differentiating between capital gains tax and income tax, we will have a nice discussion about taxes…until then, it is rather uneducated.
I posted this before:
Fat-Assed Kennedy could make $0 next year and still have millions in capital gains, which is taxed at a lower percentage than income tax…no? So, it doesn’t matter that he want to raise taxes, he is a fat, gravy drinking, corn syrup filled hypocrite.
Lumpy, we will never tax the riches of the rich by raising income tax… we will only succeed in crushing the men who comprise the backbone of this country… the small to medium business owners. They are the newly rich, and their income is sapped up like maple syrup on a 3268 pancake breakfast at Teddy’s. Pass the butter fat boy.
Every time I here CNN cater to this buffoon and play his drivel, I just want Samuel L to yell: “Shut the fuck up fat man!!!”
You are so right about corporate welfare, but let’s talk water reclamation, let’s talk farm subsidies, let’s talk all the other form of welfare… it’s all BS, but that particular version supposedly fits your needs… because I think you assume only republicans own large corporations.
So please do not talk taxes… it is not the government’s right to dictate who to steal from. Do not punish those who produce. And, if you don’t like the products that big business has provided for your consumption, or you feel they were unfairly priced, then don’t buy them. Make your own. Until then, quit whining. You entered into the bartering agreement under your own free will. Buy the goods or make them yourself… either way, I don’t give a shit. But, don’t buy them, then whine about big business ripping you off.
Move to Kenya and try to acquire a 6 megepixel digital camera… hell, try to acquire dinner. I can almost hear the whining now.
If you say that the rich should pay more than the poor, then you must justify the statement with a principle as to why. Not just because that is fair according to you.
What principle of fairness says that when I go into the 7-eleven to buy gum, I should pay $5432, but when a poor person goes into the store, they should pay $0.25. We both use the same goods and services provided by the government… why do I pay more? What principle says that is fair? Please tell me.
Lumpy, I do agree wth you about free trade. I also remember that both the Dems and Repubs really pushed for NAFTA, right? I distinctly remember Gore giving a speech about the benefits of free trade across the borders… I think it was right after he was done inventing the internet.
Also, remember that our debt must always be measured versus our GDP, and we still have a decent ratio there… Bush isn’t bankrupting us, but you are right, he is way overboard with spending. It is easy to point the finger at Bush, but he could not have prevented the inevitably tech-bubble burst, which was unreasonably supporting the economy. Nor could he have forseen 911… I am assuming. Also, much of the economic prosperity we experienced in the late 90’s was due to the Contract with America (?)…was it not? Clinton was forced to implement some 70 or 80% of that…no?
One last note: wouldn’t we be better giving 15 billion dollars to AIDS research than to African AIDS relief. I would bet that if we finally cured AIDS, Africa would be much better off than by just slowing their deaths… just an idea.
Ok, so here is my request: if you state an opinion, back it with principled argument. This way we can have nice constructive, educated debates. If you have no backing for your opinions, and they are based on nothing but feelings, then I will have to call you a thin-legged, squat rack curling, vag with man-breasts who went to a state school… or I may call you even worse: a politician.