[quote]evansmi wrote:
Scrotus wrote:
Maybe he wants to do upside down iron crosses.
do they do that?[/quote]
Yes. It’s called an inverted cross. An iron cross at 170 lb. is going to be very difficult.
TNT
[quote]evansmi wrote:
Scrotus wrote:
Maybe he wants to do upside down iron crosses.
do they do that?[/quote]
Edit: didnt see the post above when i made this.
I just did a strict Lat Raise with 40 lbs and held it.
I’ve only been at these for a few weeks.
Whoever said, 90 is out of the question adn 65 is legendary.
Is full of shit.
[quote]Guerrero wrote:
I just did a strict Lat Raise with 40 lbs and held it.
I’ve only been at these for a few weeks.
Whoever said, 90 is out of the question adn 65 is legendary.
Is full of shit.[/quote]
That’s great for you, but that doesn’t change the fact that there is NO CARRYOVER from a lateral raise to an iron cross.
dude just buy the shit i posted you’ll be pulling off shit on RINGS in no time.
[quote]Guerrero wrote:
I just did a strict Lat Raise with 40 lbs and held it.
I’ve only been at these for a few weeks.
Whoever said, 90 is out of the question adn 65 is legendary.
Is full of shit.[/quote]
Wow. Awesome. Now you just need to double it. And add 10lb.
While you’re at it maybe you could do the same for your squat, bench and deadlift? Sure it’s only another 125%.
yeah, and then take your other imaginary improvements in irrelevant assistance exercises, and do the same thing =p
If you actually want to do an iron cross, you should put down the lat raise 'bells and start doing that bw conditioning the people in this thread took the time to dig up for you.
humble up guy, even I know that the iron game takes years of discipline and hard work to show impressive results
Ya, I’m work on the planche progressions as we speak. Thanks for the advice.