I just recieved an update from “CNN” that Kobe’s accuser is “up in the air” as to whether or not she would pursue the case…
I DO NOT feel that a Woman’s sexual history should be pertinent in a CLEAR case of violent rape and assault. However, Kobe’s attorneys had argued (and won) THAT IN THIS CASE it was pertinent, because:
Evidence suggested that she had sex before AND after her encounter with Kobe, and within a relatively short time frame.
She had a stong history of bizzare “attention” seeking, in order to gain an ex-boyfriend’s attention.
Kobe’s attorney’s had built a STRONG case for the consentual nature of their encounter.
Make no mistake…Kobe is still a dumbass for getting himself in this situation in the first place. However, without some recent Judicial rulings (as above) I think that he didn’t stand a chance in Hell in front of that small town Colorado jury…
(P.S. It ain’t over yet…)