I am going to return back to the gym/strength scene, but before I do that, I want to reduce my bodyfat and work on postural defiencies. Right now my specs are 20-23% bf, ~82kg, ~182cm. Note that these mean a very small amount of LBM.
So I ask you knowledged ones: 1) which will be more effective/better/faster for my personal fat loss, a ketogenic diet or a 'normal' glucose-based diet, and 2) how high caloric deficiency can I use so that fat loss will be fast as possible and my body won't go into "survivalmode"(=severely reduced basal metabolic rate due to too low calories).
I won't do any weights before my postural deficiencies get better--this means I have reserved at min 4 weeks to get them into "acceptable" condition, and if there is still a danger of heavy lifts fucking my lower back, I will use more time before I do any weights.
I will edit my precise stats when my weight scale arrives.
keto will drop fat the fastest but muscle preservation will probably not be as good as using a carb based diet
when you say you want to lose fat before getting back to the gym/strength, do you mean competing in some way? if not then you shouldnt be waiting to start lifting until you get lean. let weight training help you get lean faster.... MUCH faster
I don't mean competing in anyway; as of now my body has a very small amount of muscle mass; this is why losing muscle at the same time won't matter imo (if fat drops fast) as there is not much to begin with. (pros outweight cons)
Lifting weights to make fat lose faster sounds good, however, I do not know how this way of dropping body fat and building muscle at the same time works. Could you elaborate? Is it even possible to reduce body fat and build muscle at the same time on couchpotato/novice stage?
However there is one thing that perhaps would disable me from being able to start weight lifting rightaway or make it signifigantly harder; I have some postural deficiencies, e.g. excessive lumbar lordosis, and I would like to give some time to correct my body, mainly by stretching critical places.
Say I had a caloric deficiency of 500kcal. Why would ketogenic diet be superior to glucose-based? A 500kcal defiency doesn't create the same effect on these two diets, keto and "normal" ?
I don't the OP expressed an interest in getting big or gaining weight at this point in time. 4-5k calories will add weight.
I'm going to recommend the opposite so he doesn't find himself in the perpetual "I'm not as lean as I'd like to be/I'm not as big as I'd like to be" seesaw most "eat big and lift" guys end up in. Again, if he said his primary goal was to get big/strong or be a power-lifter, I might suggest differently.
My advice to the OP would be get as lean as you are happy with before adding lots of calories. Lift heavy, and understand that you won't make the kind of progress on that end you would eating lots. I think a ketogenic diet is a tried-and-true way to burn fat quickly if you're okay putting strength gains on the back burner.
Based on your initial post, it sounds like you are.
If I were you (your build and stated goals), I would do Keto with heavy lifting and see how my body responds. You will lose fat on Keto. If you do great and the fat just starts falling off, I might consider going to "low carb" for awhile, and ease into carbs as I approach my leanness goals.
Lifting heavy in keto sucks, but it is essential if you want to maintain what little lean body mass it sounds like you have.
I like your approach of blasting the fat as your main goal. I'd HIGHLY suggest reading up on Intermittent Fasting. I've seen phenomenal results in regards to fat loss, and i've most definitely retained muscle mass as well as packed on a pound or two of it. a 3000kcal deficit is needed to drop 1 pound of fat. So you'll need to get there through proper nutrition and training. for someone with as high a BF%, i'd say losing 2-3lbs. a week is do-able, but it'll suck.
Pairing IF with 3-4 sessions of fasted cardio, maybe just 15-20min of HIIT routines on some days, longer sessions of steady state on the others..HIIT has been shown to work BEST in burning fat as well as building/retaining muscles, but can be draining if done several times a week.
on top of those, i'd look into total body splits. maybe weights 3 days a week, like MWF, where you'll train both upper and lower body in the same session. You've been out of the game for a while, so you're gonna be tired, BUT you'll still be able to eat a decent amount of calories because your expenditures should be fairly high. Once you feel as though you're "in shape" i'd reduce the cardio, and increase the weight training, shifting from a 3-day total body to a 4-day split routine.
I'm no expert, but i've done okay for myself and am currently on Winter Break, lots of time on my hand if you'd like me to build you a template.
FFS, look at the OP's stats. He is undersized and out of shape, which is completely understandable as he is a novice. So are we going to tell him to run a Smolov cycle, or Mountain Dog training? Fuck no. You start with the basics.
Why the fuck are we talking about keto, IF, carb cycling when it comes to his diet in this thread? Like everyone wants to overcomplicate things around here just to sound smart/cool. Start with the basics. Learn to eat like an adult. Why the hell would OP want to do an extremely low carb diet when he has very little muscle to begin with? OP: YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW YOU RESPOND TO CARBS WHILE TRAINING HEAVY BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT TRIED IT YET.
Seriously, everyone reread OP's posts to realize just how new he is to all of this and shift your gears towards giving sound advice to someone just starting out. I swear some days TNation just goes full retard for no reason =(
Okay, let's see what the early xmas elf brought in:
I will be using SS as my base program with power clean changed into bb row. About the 4000-5000 calories a day you suggest, that will be valid sometime in the far future and not now, or am I mistaken?
What is the AD? How much fat did you get with that "high" food amount in comparison to muscle?
Fat loss will be my 1st priority till I reach the state in which my body looks acceptable on a mirror.
Say my body uses the amount of BMR+X energy(theenergy used on gym)+Y(the spent on anything else, how high caloric deficiency can I use without the possibility of my body lowering BMR?
Also, if I am to be on keto and ingest carbs before a workout session, do I include these carbs on my daily energy intake calculations?
I will look into "intermittent fasting" soon. I won't take up HIIT as the major source of my cardio since it will make energy logging harder, unless someone can turn my head. However, I am probably going to use 10-20min sessions at will.
I will be using Starting Strength or similar for 3x/week for fat loss, heavy multijoint exercises, and then start building strength and mass on SS.
Is this something I need to consider taking part in?
Is there a major con for me doing low carb/zero carb keto at my very low muscle mass stage? What I have read from keto is that it will eat some of the muscles for energy (e.g. brain needs it @start because it won't get carbs from the diet), however, this amount will lower with time. I would also argument on the pros vs. cons of this--(con)a small bit of sedentary-grade muscle will be destroyed but (pro) lot's of fat will be destroyed also. Is there some reason why this wouldn't qualify for a victory?
I made my post because he hasn't mastered the basics yet. In his training, in his eating. Just like Starting Strength or 5/3/1 it seems that lately everyone is recommending carb cycling or IF without considering the OP's experience level. I was thinking something along the line of:
eat 3-4 meals, with each meal be sure to get a lean protein source, clean carb source and a healthy fat source. Once this is mastered consistently, then start to count/manage macros or cals, etc. Start simple. Be consistent. I would just about bet my life if he were to start dieting with Shelby or anyone of those esteemed online coaches, that's exactly where he'd start given his stats and experience level.