Should the UFC scrap the current 10-point must system and go back to a system in where the judges picked who they thought won the fight?
To me, that seems like a better way to do it than the 10-point must system, which leaves too many questions (10-10 frowned upon, just what does make for a 10-8 round?) and interpretations.
Why not just do it this way, for example with the Rampage-Griffin fight. Keep notes on the rounds, write down who won and then at the end, call your winner?
Round 1: Jackson (landed the biggest and most damaging blow)
Round 2: Griffin (big leg kick and dominated the entire 5 minutes)
Round 3: Griffin (a toss-up, but Griffin maybe landed more shots)
Round 4: Jackson (close, but Jackson did more damage)
Round 5: Griffin (again, real close, but Griffin moved forward and was more aggressive)
Fight’s over. I give the fight to Griffin as he was the more aggressive fighter and had the most dominating round out of the 5 that took place.