T Nation

Juan Williams on the Education President

Good heavens…even Juan Williams is outraged at Obama…


-Juan Williams

As I watch Washington politics I am not easily given to rage.

Washington politics is a game and selfishness, out-sized egos and corruption are predictable.

But over the last week I find myself in a fury.

The cause of my upset is watching the key civil rights issue of this generation ? improving big city public school education ? get tossed overboard by political gamesmanship. If there is one goal that deserves to be held above day-to-day partisanship and pettiness of ordinary politics it is the effort to end the scandalous poor level of academic achievement and abysmally high drop-out rates for America?s black and Hispanic students.

The reckless dismantling of the D.C. voucher program does not speak well of the promise by Obama to be the ?Education President.?

This is critical to our nation?s future in terms of workforce preparation to compete in a global economy but also to fulfill the idea of racial equality by providing a real equal opportunity for all young people who are willing to work hard to succeed.

In a politically calculated dance step the Obama team first indicated that they wanted the Opportunity Scholarship Program to continue for students lucky enough to have won one of the vouchers. The five-year school voucher program is scheduled to expire after the school year ending in June 2010. Secretary Duncan said in early March that it didn?t make sense ?to take kids out of a school where they?re happy and safe and satisfied and learning?those kids need to stay in their school.?

And all along the administration indicated that pending evidence that this voucher program or any other produces better test scores for students they were willing to fight for it. The president has said that when it comes to better schools he is open to supporting ?what works for kids.? That looked like a level playing field on which to evaluate the program and even possibly expanding the program.

But last week Secretary Duncan announced that he will not allow any new students to enter the D.C. voucher program. In fact, he had to take back the government?s offer of scholarships to 200 students who had won a lottery to get into the program starting next year. His rationale is that if the program does not win new funding from Congress then those students might have to go back to public school in a year.

He does not want to give the students a chance for a year in a better school? That does not make sense if the students and their families want that life-line of hope. It does not make sense if there is a real chance that the program might win new funding as parents, educators and politicians rally to undo the ?bigotry of low expectations? and open doors of opportunity ? wherever they exist ? for more low-income students.

And now Secretary Duncan has applied a sly, political check-mate for the D.C. voucher plan.

With no living, breathing students profiting from the program to give it a face and stand and defend it the Congress has little political pressure to put new money into the program. The political pressure will be coming exclusively from the teacher?s unions who oppose the vouchers, just as they oppose No Child Left Behind and charter schools and every other effort at reforming public schools that continue to fail the nation?s most vulnerable young people, low income blacks and Hispanics.

The National Education Association and other teachers? unions have put millions into Democrats? congressional campaigns because they oppose Republican efforts to challenge unions on their resistance to school reform and specifically their refusal to support ideas such as performance-based pay for teachers who raise students? test scores.

By going along with Secretary Duncan?s plan to hollow out the D.C. voucher program this president, who has spoken so passionately about the importance of education, is playing rank politics with the education of poor children. It is an outrage.

This voucher programs is unique in that it takes no money away from the beleaguered District of Columbia Public Schools. Nationwide, the strongest argument from opponents of vouchers is that it drains hard-to-find dollars from public schools that educate the majority of children.

But Congress approved the D.C. plan as an experiment and funded it separately from the D.C. school budget. It is the most generous voucher program in the nation, offering $7,500 per child to help with tuition to a parochial or private school.

With that line of attack off the table, critics of vouchers pointed out that even $7,500 is not enough to pay for the full tuition to private schools where the price of a year?s education can easily go beyond $20,000. But nearly 8,000 students applied for the vouchers. And a quarter of them, 1,714 children, won the lottery and took the money as a ticket out of the D.C. public schools.

The students, almost all of them black and Hispanic, patched together the voucher money with scholarships, other grants and parents willing to make sacrifices to pay their tuition.

What happened, according to a Department of Education study, is that after three years the voucher students scored 3.7 months higher on reading than students who remained in the D.C. schools. In addition, students who came into the D.C. voucher program when it first started had a 19 month advantage in reading after three years in private schools.

It is really upsetting to see that the Heritage Foundation has discoverd that 38 percent of the members of Congress made the choice to put their children in private schools. Of course, Secretary Duncan has said he decided not to live in Washington, D.C. because he did not want his children to go to public schools there. And President Obama, who has no choice but to live in the White House, does not send his two daughters to D.C. public schools, either. They attend a private school, Sidwell Friends, along with two students who got there because of the voucher program.

This reckless dismantling of the D.C. voucher program does not bode well for arguments to come about standards in the effort to reauthorize No Child Left Behind. It does not speak well of the promise of President Obama to be the ?Education President,? who once seemed primed to stand up for all children who want to learn and especially minority children.

And its time for all of us to get outraged about this sin against our children.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

LOL! ^^ good one Push.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Juan Williams wrote:

…this president, who has spoken so passionately about the importance of education, is playing rank politics with the education of poor children.

Could anyone expect anything different from the Product of the Chicago Machine?

Obama did not get to where he’s at because he’s smart although he is. Notice I said “smart” and not “wise”.

Obama did not get to where he’s at because he’s a good
speaker although he is. A good teleprompter speaker anyway.

Obama did not get to where he’s at because he’s charismatic although he is.

Obama got to where he’s at because key powerful people and groups propelled him. It’s time to pay his debts.[/quote]

I’m definitely sensing growing anger on the left - rather like a toddler throwing temper tantrums because reality (majority of American people, international politics, basic economics, etc.) will not concede to his innermost wishes.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
See here’s the deal…

The devil went up to Chicago, he was looking for a soul to steal.
He was in a bind ‘cos he was way behind: he was willin’ to make a deal.
When he came across this young man sawin’ on a fiddle and playin’ it hot.
And the devil jumped upon a hickory stump and said: "Boy let me tell you what:
"I bet you didn’t know it, but I’m a fiddle player too.
"And if you’d care to take a dare, I’ll make a bet with you.
"Now you play a pretty good fiddle, boy, but give the devil his due:
“I bet a fiddle of gold against your soul, 'cos I think I’m better than you.”
The boy said: "My name’s Baracky and it might be a sin,
“But I’ll take your bet, your gonna regret, 'cos I’m the best that’s ever been.”

Baracky you rosin up your bow and play your fiddle hard.
'Cos hells broke loose in Chicago and the devil deals it hard.
And if you win you get this shiny fiddle made of gold.
But if you lose, the devil gets your soul.

The devil opened up his case and he said: “I’ll start this show.”
And fire flew from his fingertips as he resined up his bow.
And he pulled the bow across his strings and it made an evil hiss.
Then a band of demons joined in and it sounded something like this.
When the devil finished, Baracky said: "Well you’re pretty good ol’ son.
“But if you’ll sit down in that chair, right there, and let me show you how its done.”

Fire on Lake Michigan, row boys, row.
Baracky’s in the house of the Chicago Sun-Times.
Unions are callin’, wantin’ mo’ dough.
“Daley, does your dog bite?”
“No, child, no.”

The devil raised his head because he knew he had Baracky whinin’.
He got his contract out and got the Kenyan signin’.
Devil said: "Baracky just remember to do my Oval Office biddin’.
“I told you once, you son of a bitch, I’m the best and I aint kiddin’.”

Fire on Lake Michigan, row boys, row.
Baracky’s in the house of the Chicago Sun-Times.
Unions are callin’, wantin’ mo’ dough.
“Daley, does your dog bite?”
“No, child, no.”[/quote]

mad skills.