Yes. Not really a great way for you to start out your rebuttal - those two things, me being able to quote BM and have concern for a cogent argument are not mutually exclusive. Sorry you think so.
This is again not an argument. Strictly your vague opinion. So far, you’re 0 for 2 in a rebuttal but let’s keep going.
It was one line of my response. Still not a rebuttal - you’re literally just repeating what I said.
Your response was rife with logical fallacies - again, you’re not rebutting my assertion - you’re simply stating what I said. Good job, you’re like 0 for 5 at this point … but let’s keep going despite your redundancy.
I feel like I applied these concepts fairly and accurately. You’re more than welcome to point out my inconsistencies.
However, your failure to refute this in any logical way proves my points. You’re still resorting to a rebuttal rife with logical fallacies. Sorry you can’t see that and adjust appropriately. 0 for 6. Let’s continue.
Quote it then. Prove me wrong. Right now you’re assuming I’m going to take your word for it…clearly I can’t take anything you say at face value since you’re batting 0 for … or is sports euphemisms too much for you to follow too?
Caution them against what? This isn’t a complete sentence.
True. it’s not. But it would be nice if you could craft a coherent argument or rebuttal. You’d think someone as smart as you would be able to form a coherent argument, yet here we are…As of now, you have done nothing to prove you know what you’re talking about. Literally nothing. You’re 0 for 100 at this point.