The more I hear of this guy, the more I like him. Just a regular Joe, haha, but he has shown the ability to think for himself and knows the common sense solutions.
[quote]tedro wrote:
http://video.ap.org/v/Legacy.aspx?mk=en-ap&g=bafd507d-1a2c-4d28-9a9b-8fc70ff6fc0c&f=1010wins&fg=email&partner=en-ap
The more I hear of this guy, the more I like him. Just a regular Joe, haha, but he has shown the ability to think for himself and knows the common sense solutions.[/quote]
Joe’s a fake. No real citizen ever has trouble with the IRS.
Interesting take Rainjack. I like it.
I hear this guy is going to get a book deal. True ?
[quote]therover wrote:
Interesting take Rainjack. I like it.
I hear this guy is going to get a book deal. True ?[/quote]
Did you take your name from the Zeppelin song? Just curious.
Pat…YES SIR !
By the way…Great avatar !
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes. [/quote]
So that he could lose to Obama again?
[quote]abcd1234 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes.
So that he could lose to Obama again? [/quote]
When was the first time?
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
abcd1234 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes.
So that he could lose to Obama again?
When was the first time?[/quote]
2004 Illinois senate race.
I would vote for Alan Keyes enthusiastically. He’s been my favorite in every debate I’ve ever seen him in. There is one clear thinking principled ol boy.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I would vote for Alan Keyes enthusiastically. He’s been my favorite in every debate I’ve ever seen him in. There is one clear thinking principled ol boy.[/quote]
You will be able to write him in in Michigan. He is officially running for the newly founded American Independent Party. I don’t completely agree with his abandonment of the Republican Party, but he has the best principles of any candidate, and is the most likely to uphold the constitution.
[quote]abcd1234 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
abcd1234 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes.
So that he could lose to Obama again?
When was the first time?
2004 Illinois senate race.[/quote]
…When he ran at the last minute after recruited by the Illinois Republican Committee, after the republican incumbent withdrew following the discovery of a sex scandal he was in.
It should be noted when Keyes filed he was at 24% in the polls. After debating he was up to 27%. He clearly won the debate season and would have faired much better had the initial conditions been a bit different.
Not the best source, but wiki has the best summary of the race:
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes. [/quote]
You guys realize Keyes is a big fraud right?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
[quote]GDollars37 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes.
You guys realize Keyes is a big fraud right?[/quote]
Why? Because he is not “acting black” enough?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
GDollars37 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes.
You guys realize Keyes is a big fraud right?
Why? Because he is not “acting black” enough? [/quote]
What is “black enough?”
[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
What is “black enough?”[/quote]
Kool cigarettes?
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
What is “black enough?”
Kool cigarettes?[/quote]
menthol?
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
What is “black enough?”
Kool cigarettes?[/quote]
white women?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
GDollars37 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Repubs, had they the balls, would have tried to promote a guy like Alan Keyes.
You guys realize Keyes is a big fraud right?
Why? Because he is not “acting black” enough? [/quote]
What the hell are you talking about? No, mostly because of money stuff. Michael Lewis goes into it in “Losers,” good book about the 1996 primaries.