This means Congress canât pass a law implementing Shariah law. Congratulations? Fearing shariah law in America is for children that donât realize we arenât required to implement shariah law.
No, they wonât - theyâll grow and be fine for the precise reasons you point out: they will come here because they like it better. And when they do, Iâll have them over for my annual Fourth of July BBQ.[quote=âtherajraj, post:302, topic:227596â]
But as long as Iâm able to live here legally, I plan to do so.
[/quote]
So everyone should live in accordance with Rajâs philosophy - except Raj himself.
Heh - you canât explain away the hypocrisy, can you? You can only be a servile, unprincipled opportunist that demands special treatment that you would deny others?
Congratulations. You are the ultimate effete snowflake.
So everyone should live in accordance with Rajâs philosophy - except Raj himself.
Heh - you canât explain away the hypocrisy, can you? You can only be a servile, unprincipled opportunist that demands special treatment that you would deny others?
Congratulations. You are the ultimate effete snowflake.
[/quote]
No just a moratorium on immigration for at least a decade
As expected, a weak non-sequitur to limp off in defeat.
Best of luck in getting your applications to the Klan and the National Policy Institute approved. Maybe you can be each organizationâs first Chief Diversity Officer.
Why canât people just focus on the much larger issue at hand. It is 2017 and people are still basing their moral compass/life on bronze age fairy tales. Whether it be any of the three Abrahamic religions or lingering Zoroastrians or whatever.
But guys lets be honest here therajrajâs views/opinions are not totally unfounded.
Iâm having trouble locating it with a quick search. In short he wrote that the wealthy should assist the poor in paying for it. I understand this could be interpreted as being pro-government provided insurance. I canât speak for him but reading his other work I would deduce he most likely would have been against the Federal government paying anything for it.
A quote of his in 1792 in regards to paying to aid a group of French refuges: âI cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.â
That says a lot. This quote has been used several times quite famously to argue against the federal government to pay for a number of things which the U.S. Constitution did not charge the government to do. Something very lost today with the government being involved in seemingly everything.
It has been supposed that he felt that assistance of the needy should be left to charity, which would also include medical costs of the poor.