Islamic Terror Won't Go Away

They couldn’t legally immigrate to America either.

What law restricted non-white immigration into the United States?

The reality is they couldn’t control who immigrated to the country back then, all they could do was enforce who was allowed to become a citizen.

It’s implicit in the naturalization laws.

One of these things is not like the other.

2 Likes

Country was around 90% white up until the 1960s.

It’s also expressed in the writings, here’s one from the first SCOTUS John Jay

“a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs.”

Oh, cool. So there wasn’t a law restricting non-whites from immigrating to the United States. Thanks for clearing that up.

“It’s implicit”…

Well, then I guess Mexican anchor babies are U.S. citizens because “It’s implicit” in the 14th, right?

1 Like

The first car came off the line in 1907.

You know, while we’re stating random facts that don’t matter.

No Problem.

The Founding Fathers were White Racialists who loved their people and wanted the country to be for their people (White NW Europeans mostly British).

They weren’t interested in other racial populations sharing their land.

I think you’re grossly overestimating how much people care about what a bunch of guys who have been dead for hundreds of years wanted in a world they couldn’t have possibly predicted.

This is falsse, has been demonstrated to you as false, yet you keep repeating it.

Also, were this actually true, you’re obligated to do our Founders a solid and leave.

1 Like

You don’t need to estimate or predict, the founding father’s were prolific writers and told you exactly what they wanted and how they viewed the future.

Calling them “Racialists” is quite a generalization because they already were debating about Black slavery and such, which is why they left out the “Right to own Property” from the Bill of Rights.

I’d like to see where any of them ever said they wanted a Caucasian only country. Sounds made up.

You’re right the founding fathers ultimate plan was to create a nation where eventually people who looked liked them cease to exist in America.

Everything is currently going to plan as they had hoped

What are the founding fathers views on internet privacy? How about universal health care? How about -insert anything that didn’t exist yet here-?

I refuse to believe any verbiage the FF put forth was done so with the knowledge they predicted the scope of the planet we have today. It’s simply not possible. They were vague on purpose (because they understood you can’t ever fully predict the future in a grand scale).

Furthermore, even if they had stated that they wanted their wishes to be carried out regardless of the future, who cares? This is our world to live in and make decisions on, not theirs.

That wasn’t their plan either, and that’s an idiotic straw man.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but your shtick is getting old.

You’re not an American, you’ve been in our country a short period of time and your entry here had nothing to do with merit, everything you think you’ve learned about our country is derived from moronic, racist fringe websites - all this is transparently so - and yet you’re constantly trying to lecture Americans - in many cases ninth and tenth generation Americans - what their country is really about, which hilariously happens to coincide with the revisionist version of history adhered to continental European ethnonationalists (so American!).

Here’s an idea - wouldn’t it be a far better use of your time to quit ignorantly flapping your gums about “America” and spend more time listening to people who actually know?

1 Like

Sure tell me more about their vision for a multicultural paradise. Please don’t leave out any other clearly not stupid or childish understandings you have about the Founding Fathers and their intentions.

Serious question. Why do you (personally) place so much stock in the FFs. Is it because your interpretation of their verbiage aligns so closely with your own? Or is it because you genuinely believe they knew better?

This is from the National Review of all places:

Read it carefully especially the first part.

1 Like

Very easy to answer if you’ve read their works. I have assume you aren’t learned enough. Madison wrote on healthcare on several occasions.

I suggest you leave the thinking to those more equipped to handle the work.

It’s very easy to determine how they felt about things that didn’t exist yet? Flawless answer. 3 cheers.

I must not have read enough to see what Washington wanted us to do with the internet.