Here’ an unusual development. Why would the Supreme Court leak a draft of such a momentous decision? I’m not sure, but if I were about to about to upset a lot of progressives in 2022 I’d think about doing my best to let them down gently. Please, don’t take up any more torches.
We all like mom and pop stores here in the conservative camp too, but that’s no reason to burn down any more Targets or actual community-owned buildings in your or anyone else’s communities. Some of us welcome a new Target opening to service our community with more affordable options to get stuff.
I’m not sure if leaking a draft document like this will help or hurt, but I suppose it gives a window of opportunity for everyone to become internet experts on both the case law and basic understanding of civics in the USA. Hopefully these emerging experts are somehow able to get their ideas out to people on the remote fringes of social media that remain beyond the reach of Elon Musk.
Maybe this is all fake news. Or perhaps a massive nothing-burger. I suppose we’ll find out soon. In the meantime, discuss!
Is this leak an effort to begin questioning the authority of the Supreme Court? Will “rage” on social media get enough traction for those politicians who want to make changes to the Supreme Court to pass legislation?
That’s correct. It is yet another desperate conservative cope.
Cope: Elon Musk is gonna bring back unbridled free speech.
Cope: Get woke, go broke.
Cope: Thinking abortion is going away.
Cope: Much of America is armed.
I bet if it is found out who leaked it (likely an assistant or something), that they will no longer have a job related to the law.
I am not sure what the motivation for the leak is, but I do think it will be a motivation for progressives in the midterm.
It does sound like the leaked document is either a very good fake or legitimate. Most “experts” seem to think it is real. I wonder if it is overturned, what we will see out of corporations.
There are no shortage of people in government positions who consider activism to be more important than any kind of governing, professional or legal principle.
Which(reaction) is very odd, considering that would still allow someone needing an abortion to pretty-easily kill her unborn child with a relatively short trip to another state.
How are those spectacular misses? I believe the criteria is: “recognition of the person who had the most influence on the events of the year, for good or for ill.”