(EDITED-got the cycle dosages wrong lol)
He's taking mad long to respond and I'm curious too lol. What if
Cycles 1 was
testP/trenA/mastP 50/50/50 for 8 weeks,
done 3 times through the year, total 24 weeks.
and Cycles 2 was
testP/trenA/MastP 75/75/75 for 8 weeks,
done 2 times through the year, total 16 weeks and same total anabolics run.
Maybe the downside to 3 cycles would be less muscle is kept because you gotta kickstart your system an extra third time? then again the breaks would make each cycle more effective again since you return to homeostasis. Which one would you choose Robert? I'd probably go with cycles 1. Appreciate the input! Sorry for barging in OP lol not sure if you're gonna respond though.