I would like you to go back and read your most recent post. Then read it again.
It is filled with assumptions that are pretty damn thin.
Your mind seemingly CANNOT grasp the concept of using front groups to do the dirty work.
Here's syria and al qaeda:
Here's al qaeda and wmd:
Now, don't respond to this for a couple of days. Think about it.
Now you tell me which one of our premises is more likely.
Yours: "No threat from these groups."
Mine: "Serious threat from hostile regimes and their surrogates."
I'd be interested to see if your mind is flexible enough to consider other alternatives.