ye, the people in Iran are much better off if you nuke them: you can say what you want now my iranian friend, sucks that you are dead.
and please this is NOT about Ahmadinejad. it is about the US wanting to dominate the region and Ahmadinejad is just in their way. that`s it. Not that he is a good guy, but there are evil people in governments everywhere. just look at burma right now: Nobody cares, because nobody has any interesst there.
If Micky Mouse would rule the iran and be in your way Micky Mouse would be the most evil thing the world has ever seen. Please, just be honest: Nobody really cares about if some journalist in iran can write what he wants (except the journalist) - this is all just a build up for a “justice” war.
The US wants to dominate the region and Ahmadinejad is not going along - so he will be removed. Thats it. Simple. All the rest is propaganda.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Now there’s a realistic possibility: Bush going to Iran. Not to be TOO cynical, but do you think this might be a PR ploy? Or do you think that Mahmoud sincerely believes Bush might just happen to stop in Iran someday?[/quote]
You’re missing the point that is Iran’s openness to talk, while the US’s only diplomacy has been threats, sanctions and bombings lately.
If Bush accepted Tehran’s olive branch (via the Swiss ambassador) in 2003, we wouldn’t be in this mess.
[quote]Mishima wrote:
and please this is NOT about Ahmadinejad. it is about the US wanting to dominate the region and Ahmadinejad is just in their way. that`s it. Not that he is a good guy, but there are evil people in governments everywhere. just look at burma right now: Nobody cares, because nobody has any interesst there.
If Micky Mouse would rule the iran and be in your way Micky Mouse would be the most evil thing the world has ever seen. Please, just be honest: Nobody really cares about if some journalist in iran can write what he wants (except the journalist) - this is all just a build up for a “justice” war.
The US wants to dominate the region and Ahmadinejad is not going along - so he will be removed. Thats it. Simple. All the rest is propaganda. [/quote]
The USA dominating the region is a GOOD thing. Why do people look at our desire to control our own destiny as somehow a bad thing? Sure, we’re there for the oil. Well, duh…of course! Who SHOULD control it? Osama? Ahminajihad? Yeah, they’ll be sure to keep western civilisation functioning.
When we lose control of the Middle East (which will happen someday, due to bankruptcy), you won’t be able to get to work, old people will freeze to death, and there will be no food on the shelves at your local market.
I think the WEST (even Belgium) should conquer the Middle East and treat it as a fiefdom. The people would be better off and we’d have the oil. Do this until fusion becomes realistic.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
lixy wrote:
Iran Invites Bush to Speak at University
[i]Sep 28, 11:58 AM EDT
Associated Press
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad invited President Bush to speak at an Iranian university if the American leader ever traveled to the Islamic Republic, state-run television reported Friday.[/i]
http://www.columbian.com/news/APStories/AP09282007news205140.cfm
Now there’s a realistic possibility: Bush going to Iran. Not to be TOO cynical, but do you think this might be a PR ploy? Or do you think that Mahmoud sincerely believes Bush might just happen to stop in Iran someday?[/quote]
He’ll visit the troops there next Spring.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
The USA dominating the region is a GOOD thing. Why do people look at our desire to control our own destiny as somehow a bad thing? Sure, we’re there for the oil. Well, duh…of course! Who SHOULD control it? Osama? Ahminajihad? Yeah, they’ll be sure to keep western civilisation functioning.[/quote]
Funny thing is, people of a country tend to think that the resources found within the country belongs to them. It’s a very annoying trait of all those smelly brown people with flies in their faces.
Well then, since we already know this now, wouldn’t it be a good idea to plan for it and make sure that we can deal with the problem before it occurs?
If we invested just one year of global military spending in scientific R&D, we might already have fusion, or cheap efficient solar cells. And cancer cures. And clean water for every human being, etc.
I guess spending trillions on ways to better kill each other is the wise way to go.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
He’ll visit the troops there next Spring.[/quote]
He’ll get a special permission to travel abroad during his impeachment hearings.
[quote]pookie wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
He’ll visit the troops there next Spring.
He’ll get a special permission to travel abroad during his impeachment hearings.
[/quote]
Maybe the compassionate people of Iran will offer him a place to stay, what with no extradition treaty and all.
As long as he doesn’t start a website or newspaper that counters the governmental views…
[quote]Chushin wrote:
pookie wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
He’ll visit the troops there next Spring.
He’ll get a special permission to travel abroad during his impeachment hearings.
Gee, you mean we dumb Americans will be “smart enough” to impeach the bad guy? Yeah for us![/quote]
Shit. Fatal flaw in my predictions.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
As long as he doesn’t start a website or newspaper that counters the governmental views… [/quote]
Saudi Arabia? Egypt?
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Maybe the compassionate people of Iran will offer him a place to stay, what with no extradition treaty and all.[/quote]
Wouldn’t be above Iran to offer sanctuary to a known war criminal.
I’m sure that’s what Bush dreams of: Starting a newspaper.
And reading it to the end.