T Nation

Intermittent Fasting?

What do you guys think about it? I don’t do it myself, but find it pretty interesting.

"…Intermittent fasting involves a period of fasting followed by a period of feeding. Studies on intermittent fasting and human subjects has shown positive effects on health indicators, including insulin sensitivity. These studies often involve long periods of food deprivation followed by a very large meal; one example being a 24 hour fast followed by eating the daily calorie allotment in one meal. By doing this, the test subjects lost more body fat, and actually gained lean mass, in comparison to a regular meal pattern. Keep in mind that these individuals were not even lifting weights in the first place; this suggests that the one-meal-a-day eating pattern had positive effects on body composition, possibly by impacting hormones or gene expression. However, I feel strongly that such extreme measures are not needed to in order to reap the benefits of intermittent fasting for those wishing to improve their body composition.

The Intermittent Fasting protocol for lean gains and fat loss, aims to take advantage of the powerful fat burning properties of the fast and the nutrient partitioning effects of short term overfeeding, in order to reduce bodyfat and increase lean body mass. Therefore I have devised a system, through trial and error, which involves a short fast in combination with weightlifting and overfeeding, in order to achieve lean muscular gains and fat loss. I have significantly improved my body composition with this seemingly �??controversial�?? way of meal patterning, and several others has had the same success. Those that convert from a typical high meal frequency eating regime to the Intermittent fasting protocol seldom go back to their old habits of obsessively eating every second hour, yet never really feeling satisfied. I will briefly describe some guidelines I use in order to put this diet in a contextual framework.

The Intermittent Fasting protocol consists of two phases; the fasting period and the overfeeding period. The basic idea behind this protocol is to provide nutrients at a time where they will be used for recovery and repair, being the post workout window. In order to receive the benefits of nutrient partitioning, the protocol consists of a fasting period, lasting 16 hours. This means you initiate your first meal 16 hours before eating the last meal on the night before (which is easily done by skipping breakfast and lunch). Thus, ideally all eating is done within an 8 ±1 hour timeframe. Most do well with 3 meals, some may even prefer 2 or 4. To some this may seem daunting, as some will assume that hunger will be an issue, but this is anecdotally not the case; the fast has strong appetite suppressant properties, which is partly explained by increased catecholamine output during the fast. Contrary to popular belief, there is no proteolysis during this period. You do not need to worry that you will be �??burning�?? muscle tissue during the fast.

The fasting aspect of the diet has several positive effects on lipolysis, partly mediated by catecholamines and growth hormone release during the fast. Besides acting as an appetite suppressant, the catecholamines provides a stimulant effect; you will most likely feel like you have more energy and focus than usual (in this state any other stimulants, like caffeine for example, also has a more potent effect in comparison to being consumed on a full stomach)…

After fasting for 16 hours, one breaks the fast with a meal whose macronutrient profile differs depending on if it´s a workout day or a rest day. On workout days, one breaks the fast with a moderate sized pre-workout meal, providing adequate carbohydrates and protein. After the workout, you will consume the largest meal of the day and proceed to eat once your calorie quota for the day is filled (this quota is your maintenance intake + a certain % depending on your goals). Carbohydrates are favourable to consume in this meal. You may split meals how you see fit, but you should keep the eating window to 8 hours, including the pre-workout meal. My day may look like this for example:

4 pm: pre-workout meal

5-6: workout

7-12 pm: post workout meal, and the rest of calorie requirements for this day. This is the overfeeding period of Intermittent Fating. After the last meal, the fast starts again in order to initiate the first meal at 4 pm the next day (these hours will be dependent on your own schedule, and times used here are merely for illustrative purposes). In order to have a steady supply of amino acids in your blood during the fast, I suggest the last meal consists of whole foods and slow digesting protein (meat or cottage cheese for example).

On rest days, the calorie intake will differ from your workout day. Depending on goals, one may tailor the calories to either fat loss, weight gain or improved body composition…"

And here is a few studies:

  1. “The daily distribution of food intake can influence the regulation of energy balance and, in consequence, the control of body weight. Two aspects of this question must be considered: the daily number of eating occasions and their temporal distribution. Since the 1960s, epidemiological studies have reported an inverse relationship between frequency of eating and body weight, suggesting that a “nibbling” pattern could help to prevent obesity. This notion has later been put into question by the recognition of a high level of dietary underreporting in overweight individuals. In addition, no difference in total daily energy expenditure has been documented as a function of daily meal number. Weight loss is not facilitated by high meal frequency. Snacking in obese subjects is associated with higher energy and fat intake. By contrast, in normal-weight people, snacking does not necessarily lead to increased energy intake, while snacks often contain more carbohydrates and less fat than regular meals. Obese people tend to eat little in the morning and much in the afternoon and the evening. In extreme cases, a “night-eating syndrome” is observed. Understanding the relationship between the circadian distribution of intake and obesity (or resistance to weight loss) seems critical for theoretical as well as clinical reasons.”

Impact of the daily meal pattern on energy balance; Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition, Volume 48, Number 3, October 2004 , pp. 114-118(5)

  1. “Several epidemiological studies have observed an inverse relationship between people’s habitual frequency of eating and body weight, leading to the suggestion that a ‘nibbling’ meal pattern may help in the avoidance of obesity. A review of all pertinent studies shows that, although many fail to find any significant relationship, the relationship is consistently inverse in those that do observe a relationship. However, this finding is highly vulnerable to the probable confounding effects of post hoc changes in dietary patterns as a consequence of weight gain and to dietary under-reporting which undoubtedly invalidates some of the studies. We conclude that the epidemiological evidence is at best very weak, and almost certainly represents an artefact. A detailed review of the possible mechanistic explanations for a metabolic advantage of nibbling meal patterns failed to reveal significant benefits in respect of energy expenditure. Although some short-term studies suggest that the thermic effect of feeding is higher when an isoenergetic test load is divided into multiple small meals, other studies refute this, and most are neutral. More importantly, studies using whole-body calorimetry and doubly-labelled water to assess total 24 h energy expenditure find no difference between nibbling and gorging. Finally, with the exception of a single study, there is no evidence that weight loss on hypoenergetic regimens is altered by meal frequency. We conclude that any effects of meal pattern on the regulation of body weight are likely to be mediated through effects on the food intake side of the energy balance equation.”

Meal frequency and energy balance. Br J Nutr. 1997 Apr;77 Suppl 1:S57-70.

  1. OBJECTIVE: To test if a diet of 4.2 MJ/24 h as six isocaloric meals would result in a lower subsequent energy intake, or greater energy output than (a) 4.2 MJ/24 h as two isocaloric meals or (b) a morning fast followed by free access to food.

CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, meal frequency and a period of fasting have no major impact on energy intake or expenditure but energy expenditure is delayed with a lower meal frequency compared with a higher meal frequency. This might be attributed to the thermogenic effect of food continuing into the night when a later, larger meal is given. A morning fast resulted in a diet which tended to have a lower percentage of energy from carbohydrate than with no fast.

Compared with nibbling, neither gorging nor a morning fast affect short-term energy balance in obese patients in a chamber calorimeter. International Journal Of Obesity, April 2001, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 519-528

  1. “RESULTS: Fasting glucose and insulin values were not affected by meal frequency, but peak insulin and AUC of insulin responses to the test meal were higher after the irregular compared to the regular eating patterns (P < 0.01). The irregular meal frequency was associated with higher fasting total (P < 0.01) and LDL (P < 0.05) cholesterol. CONCLUSION: The irregular meal frequency appears to produce a degree of insulin resistance and higher fasting lipid profiles, which may indicate a deleterious effect on these cardiovascular risk factors.”

Regular meal frequency creates more appropriate insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles compared with irregular meal frequency in healthy lean women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jul;58(7):1071-7.

  1. “During the first 2 days of starvation there is often a small absolute increase in BMR relative to values obtained after an overnight fast.”

Protein-Energy Interactions, United Nations University, UN ACC-Subcommittee on Nutrition, the International Dietary Energy Consultancy Group (I/D/E/C/G).

  1. “This experiment is the first in humans to show that intermittent fasting increases insulin-mediated glucose uptake rates, and the findings are compatible with the thrifty gene concept.”

Effect of intermittent fasting and refeeding on insulin action in healthy men. J Appl Physiol. 2005 Dec;99(6):2128-36. Epub 2005 Jul 28.

  1. "Dietary restriction has been shown to have several health benefits including increased insulin sensitivity, stress resistance, reduced morbidity, and increased life span.

“intermittent fasting resulted in beneficial effects that met or exceeded those of caloric restriction including reduced serum glucose and insulin levels and increased resistance of neurons in the brain to excitotoxic stress. Intermittent fasting therefore has beneficial effects on glucose regulation and neuronal resistance to injury in these mice that are independent of caloric intake.”

Intermittent fasting dissociates beneficial effects of dietary restriction on glucose metabolism and neuronal resistance to injury from calorie intake. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13; 100(10): 6216�??6220.

  1. “We conclude that CR and IF dietary regimens can ameliorate age-related deficits in cognitive function by mechanisms that may or may not be related to Abeta and tau pathologies.”

Intermittent fasting and caloric restriction ameliorate age-related behavioral deficits in the triple-transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.
Neurobiol Dis. 2007 Apr;26(1):212-20. Epub 2007 Jan 13.

  1. “Although all cells in the body require energy to survive and function properly, excessive calorie intake over long time periods can compromise cell function and promote disorders such as cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes and cancers. Accordingly, dietary restriction (DR; either caloric restriction or intermittent fasting, with maintained vitamin and mineral intake) can extend lifespan and can increase disease resistance. Recent studies have shown that DR can have profound effects on brain function and vulnerability to injury and disease. DR can protect neurons against degeneration in animal models of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases and stroke. Moreover, DR can stimulate the production of new neurons from stem cells (neurogenesis) and can enhance synaptic plasticity, which may increase the ability of the brain to resist aging and restore function following injury. Interestingly, increasing the time interval between meals can have beneficial effects on the brain and overall health of mice that are independent of cumulative calorie intake.”

Meal size and frequency affect neuronal plasticity and vulnerability to disease: cellular and molecular mechanisms.
J Neurochem. 2003 Feb;84(3):417-31.

  1. “Intermittent fasting (IF; reduced meal frequency) and caloric restriction (CR) extend lifespan and increase resistance to age-related diseases in rodents and monkeys and improve the health of overweight humans. Both IF and CR enhance cardiovascular and brain functions and improve several risk factors for coronary artery disease and stroke including a reduction in blood pressure and increased insulin sensitivity. Cardiovascular stress adaptation is improved and heart rate variability is increased in rodents maintained on an IF or a CR diet. Moreover, rodents maintained on an IF regimen exhibit increased resistance of heart and brain cells to ischemic injury in experimental models of myocardial infarction and stroke. The beneficial effects of IF and CR result from at least two mechanisms–reduced oxidative damage and increased cellular stress resistance. Recent findings suggest that some of the beneficial effects of IF on both the cardiovascular system and the brain are mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in the brain. Interestingly, cellular and molecular effects of IF and CR on the cardiovascular system and the brain are similar to those of regular physical exercise, suggesting shared mechanisms. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which IF and CR affect the blood vessels and heart and brain cells will likely lead to novel preventative and therapeutic strategies for extending health span.”

Beneficial effects of intermittent fasting and caloric restriction on the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems.
J Nutr Biochem. 2005 Mar;16(3):129-37.

  1. “The vulnerability of the nervous system to advancing age is all too often manifest in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. In this review article we describe evidence suggesting that two dietary interventions, caloric restriction (CR) and intermittent fasting (IF), can prolong the health-span of the nervous system by impinging upon fundamental metabolic and cellular signaling pathways that regulate life-span. CR and IF affect energy and oxygen radical metabolism, and cellular stress response systems, in ways that protect neurons against genetic and environmental factors to which they would otherwise succumb during aging.”

Caloric restriction and intermittent fasting: two potential diets for successful brain aging.
Ageing Res Rev. 2006 Aug;5(3):332-53. Epub 2006 Aug 8.

  1. “These results demonstrate that GH�??possibly by maintenance of circulating concentrations of free IGF-I�??is a decisive component of protein conservation during fasting and provide evidence that the underlying mechanism involves a decrease in muscle protein breakdown.”

The Protein-Retaining Effects of Growth Hormone During Fasting Involve Inhibition of Muscle-Protein Breakdown. Diabetes 50:96-104, 2001

  1. "Glucose kinetics and organ substrate balance were measured basally and for 5 h after eating pizza (600 kcal) containing carbohydrates 75 g as starch, proteins 37 g, and lipids 17 g.

It is concluded that in human subjects, 1) the absorption of a natural mixed meal is still incomplete at 5 h after ingestion"

Splanchnic and leg substrate exchange after ingestion of a natural mixed meal in humans. Diabetes, Vol 48, Issue 5 958-966, (1999)

  1. “When the diet was served in six equal meals per (lay, the women�??s mean serum cholesterol level was intermediate between but not significantly different from that observed on the three meals per day or two small and one large meal per day regimens. Serum levels of phospholipids, glycerides, and total fatty acids were not significantlyn affected by the frequency or size of meals. No significant differences among the regimens were observed in the retention of nitrogen, calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus, in fat digestibility, or in urinary excretion of thiamine and riboflavin.”

Frequency and size of meals and serum lipids, nitrogen and mineral retention, fat digestibility, and urinary thiamine and riboflavin in young women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1967 Aug;20(8):816-24.

  1. “The results suggest that muscle protein synthesis responds rapidly to increased availability of amino acids but is then inhibited, despite continued amino acid availability. These results suggest that the fed state accretion of muscle protein may be limited by a metabolic mechanism whenever the requirement for substrate for protein synthesis is exceeded.”

“Furthermore the oversupply of amino acids beyond the currently identified requirement when given continuously may have no benefit in stimulating tissue synthesis but merely stimulate the induction of enzymes of amino acid catabolism”

Latency and duration of stimulation of human muscle protein synthesis during continuous infusion of amino acids. Journal of Physiology (2001), 532.2, pp. 575-579

  1. “To determine whether human lipogenesis is influenced by the frequency of meal consumption, 12 subjects were divided into two groups and fed isocaloric nutritionally adequate liquid diets over 3 days, either as three larger diurnal (n = 6) or as six small, evenly spaced (n = 6) meals per day.”

“These findings suggest that consuming fewer but larger daily meals is not accompanied by increases in triglyceride fatty acid synthesis, despite the observation of hormonal peaks.”

Meal frequency influences circulating hormone levels but not lipogenesis rates in humans. Metabolism. 1995 Feb;44(2):218-23.

  1. “A gorging pattern of energy intake resulted in a stronger diurnal periodicity of nutrient utilization, compared to a nibbling pattern. However, there were no consequences for the total 24 h energy expenditure (24 h EE) of the two feeding patterns (5.57 +/- 0.16 kJ/min for the gorging pattern; 5.44 +/- 0.18 kJ/min for the nibbling pattern). Concerning the periodicity of nutrient utilization, protein oxidation during the day did not change between the two feeding patterns. In the gorging pattern, carbohydrate oxidation was significantly elevated during the interval following the first meal (ie from 1200 h to 1500 h, P less than 0.01) and the second meal (ie from 1800 h to 2100 h, P less than 0.05). The decreased rate of carbohydrate oxidation observed during the fasting period (from rising in the morning until the first meal at 1200 h), was compensated by an increased fat oxidation from 0900 to 1200 h to cover energy needs. In the nibbling pattern, carbohydrate and fat oxidation remained relatively constant during the active hours of the day.”

Influence of the feeding frequency on nutrient utilization in man: consequences for energy metabolism. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Mar;45(3):161-9.

  1. “RESULTS: There were no significant alterations in either the positive or negative regulators of muscle mass at either 15 or 40 h, when compared to gene expression measured 3 h after a meal. Similarly, plasma myostatin and IGF-1 were also unaltered at these times. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous observations in catabolic and cachexic diseased states, short-term fasting (40 h) fails to elicit marked alteration of the genes regulating both muscle-specific protein synthesis or atrophy. Greater periods of fasting may be required to initiate coordinated inhibition of myogenic and atrogenic gene expression.”

Actions of short-term fasting on human skeletal muscle myogenic and atrogenic gene expression. Ann Nutr Metab. 2006;50(5):476-81. Epub 2006 Aug 24.

  1. “Irregular meal frequency led to a lower postprandial energy expenditure compared with the regular meal frequency, while the mean energy intake was not significantly different between the two. The reduced TEF with the irregular meal frequency may lead to weight gain in the long term.”

Decreased thermic effect of food after an irregular compared with a regular meal pattern in healthy lean women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 May;28(5):653-60.


A controlled trial of reduced meal frequency without caloric restriction in healthy, normal-weight, middle-aged adults1,2,3
Kim S Stote, David J Baer, Karen Spears, David R Paul, G Keith Harris, William V Rumpler, Pilar Strycula, Samer S Najjar, Luigi Ferrucci, Donald K Ingram, Dan L Longo and Mark P Mattson

1 From the Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Beltsville, MD (KSS, DJB, KS, DRP, GKW, and WVR), and the Clinical Research Branch (PS and LF), and the Laboratories of Cardiovascular Science (SSN), Experimental Gerontology (DKI), Immunology (DLL), and Neurosciences (MPM), National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD

Background:Although consumption of 3 meals/d is the most common pattern of eating in industrialized countries, a scientific rationale for this meal frequency with respect to optimal health is lacking. A diet with less meal frequency can improve the health and extend the lifespan of laboratory animals, but its effect on humans has never been tested.

Objective:A pilot study was conducted to establish the effects of a reduced-meal-frequency diet on health indicators in healthy, normal-weight adults.

Design:The study was a randomized crossover design with two 8-wk treatment periods. During the treatment periods, subjects consumed all of the calories needed for weight maintenance in either 3 meals/d or 1 meal/d.

Results:Subjects who completed the study maintained their body weight within 2 kg of their initial weight throughout the 6-mo period. There were no significant effects of meal frequency on heart rate, body temperature, or most of the blood variables measured. However, when consuming 1 meal/d, subjects had a significant increase in hunger; a significant modification of body composition, including reductions in fat mass; significant increases in blood pressure and in total, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations; and a significant decrease in concentrations of cortisol.

Conclusions:Normal-weight subjects are able to comply with a 1 meal/d diet. When meal frequency is decreased without a reduction in overall calorie intake, modest changes occur in body composition, some cardiovascular disease risk factors, and hematologic variables. Diurnal variations may affect outcomes.

Interesting? Yes. Am I willing to attempt it? No. It’s just a little to extreme for my tastes.

it just screams deficiency to me even through reading all of the studies and stuff… you deplete your body for an abnormal amount of time, then replenish it straightaway… sounds wrong to me HOWEVER…

as a royal marine, during the final phase of training, we often went very long periods without food… had water but no food… then when we would get back to barracks, we would have fresh and a lot of it… then go sleep as we were also (and now too!!) deprived of proper sleeping patterns… throughout this phase we all lost weight, but didnt have any short term negative effects…

First, I’d just like to say that being from Tampa Bay, I love esk221’s logo.

Tx5000, while the studies seem pretty interesting, I’m still think eating 4-6 small meals a day is the way to go.

What sort of results are you seeking?

Also being from Tampa Bay, I love the logo as well. Padilla how old are you?

I fast for three hours about four to five times a day.

Someone try it and tell us how it works. This seems like what the majority of America does (eat one large meal at night) and the majority of America is obese.

[quote]GetSwole wrote:
Also being from Tampa Bay, I love the logo as well. Padilla how old are you?[/quote]

I’m 19, fortunately not old enough to remember the “glory days.”

There was a big thread about this a few months ago. Stick with what works- not this fasting crap.

So you want to eat your nuts and fish oil all at the same time? You’ll probably puke, especially if you’ve been FASTING all day.

Also, you can only take 500 mg calcium at a time, which means you’ll have weak bones, no teeth, and heart problems by the time you reach 40.

You’ll probably rupture your stomach if you want to have everything in one sitting unless you choose to puke.

Cavey is more or less right. Your stomach shrinks as you fast, even only during one day. For example, I know plenty of Jews who fasted on one of their Holy Days, and even drinking a bottle of water afterwards was hard, let alone a sandwich from Subway.

So, like I said in my other reply, I’d hold off and just eat smaller portioned meals 4-6 times a day.

IF is a pretty interesting concept and getting more and more popular. Of course if you’re coming from the so called Tupperware eating pattern (eat every 2-3 hours no matter what), it sounds weird. It’s not weird, it’s just out of the box.

You’d need to be fat adapted though. A sugar burner would have a tough time in the beginning.

I’m quite sure I’ll try it some day, just for now I’m not certain of it’s benefits beyond those of a normal low carb diet.

Where is the original posters quote from?

What high school did you graduate from Padilla? I’m from hillsborough county

Bump. Really interested in some good scientific discussion on this.

[quote]Thomas Gabriel wrote:
Bump. Really interested in some good scientific discussion on this. [/quote]

You won’t many in favor of this that will be able to back it up with science. You’ll find plenty on the other team though…

I see lots of anecdotal evidence online that it works, and I have read studies showing its merits, but I’m still pretty confused on its mechanism of action. There have been guys that got blood tests during fasting that showed no increase in cortisol. I always thought that the reason we generally believe in eating so often is to avoid catabolism caused by cortisol. Another thing I don’t understand is how these guys are bulking while doing this. They consume a huge number of cals in a very short period of time. Even with the improved insulin sensitivity that IM should help with, I find it hard to believe that it is possible for 3500 cals in 8 hours go don’t store mostly as fat.

Hey guys, I havent posted in a while, I prefer to let the experts speak and I continue to learn, however someone here asked if anyone had tried it so I thought I would chime in.

Background, I’m 37 and I’ve been training since I was 16. I think I have tried most of the BB diets and gimmicks for size, weight loss etc. My best results were with the Metabolic diet of 6-7 months but I felt small at 215 when I am normally 245, although I was at 10% BF.
Prior to starting the intermittent fasting I was on the Cheat to lose diet for 8 weeks with solid results although my BW didnt change more than 5-7lbs, but body composition did.

At the start of the 9th week I heard about a program called EATSTOPEAT by Brad Pilon and to me it made sense.

I know from personal experience that eating every 2-3 hours felt like I was “taxing” my digestive system and in hind sight I dont think it was meant to run 16 hours a day.

I also couldnt seem to shake the love handles completely and would often smooth over unless really careful with my diet. Which of course is getting harder every year.

Anyways I have been using the system of fasting for two 24 hour periods a week. So typically I eat breakfast on Sunday morning and then dont eat again until Monday morning and in that time I would get two training sessions and some cardio bouts of swimming or running. With every fast my energy level improves and I feel like an energizer bunny on my fasting days and lighter on my feet for MMA training too.

So after the fast I eat normally for the next three days then fast again for 24 hours then eat for two days and repeat. Every morning before I end my fast I notice visible changes to my body over night.

I cant do Brad’s writing justice but I would suggest you read it and check out what he has to say for yourself along with his own personal story.

So all I can say to the curious is that I feel better, look better, even fuller and leaner than before and I dont fret all the time about what I put in my mouth (although I still maintain good habits) but I dont stress about eating every few hours and man does it free up time!

So try it and see for yourself or you can slag it without really knowing. Think of man’s development from an evolutionary perspective which is measured in ten’s of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of years. Man has only been getting 2-3 three square meals a day for maybe a few thousand years… so it would make sense that our systems are designed for intermittent fastings but as I said I am not a scientist so I will let other speak to that.

Thats my personal experience and still a rather short one but time will tell.

Oh ya one other interesting point Brad makes is that there are only two states for the body, fed or fasted and when you are fed yoru insulin levels are high and insulin is a storage hormone which resists the breakdown of fat for energy… so it would seem to me that you would have to have a perfect balance of calories in to calories out to ensure you didnt put on fat.

When you are in the fasted state GH levels go up, adrenalin response is better (hunter state) and glucagon levels rise… insulin drops by 70% within the first 18 hours with the greatest fat burning taking place between 18-24 hours.
Anyways take a read for yourself…

I’ve been giving the Warrior Diet a test drive for about 3 weeks so far. I thought I might as well verify if it works for myself, and it also happened to jive with my schedule. So far it’s working. I’m getting lean pretty fast and my strength has continued to increase gradually as ever.

The research looks promising… I’d like to see more data related to this subject in the future. The studies showing a protective effect on muscle, lowered insulin and cortisol, and increased BMR seem to make a good case for this method being in the least, effective for recomposition phases. I’ll just keep on keepin on and see if I can possibly gain any muscle this way after I’m done leaning out.

note: this is a quick post with only anecdotal info.

I’ve been incorporating and doing something that might be called Intermittent Fasting, but I’ve just integrated it more into what I like to call my Predator Diet (meat, healthy fats, tons of green veggies, etc ala Poliquin and others).

Yeah, I know, it’s all semantics, but it makes me feel better labeling my diet “Predator” versus low-carb or Zone-like or Atkins-esque, etc… :wink:

anyway…I do the following 1-2 days per week:

After eating my final meal of the day, I won’t eat for ~ the next 24 hours: ie- i go to sleep and skip “breakfast” and “lunch” (or better put don’t eat through the times that most people normally associate with these eating-time descriptions) then start eating again at roughly the same time that i had my last meal the previous day.

The night that I break the fast I don’t try to superfeed and get a whole day’s worth of nutrients in before going to sleep, but I always get in at least 2 very high quality meals before my mommy makes the long drive to come tuck me in.

my diet/training goals are geared towards fat loss right now. I’m lifting heavy 4 days/week and doing 30-60 minutes of NEPA everyday. I just finished my 4th week on this regimen and am doing well. I have plenty of energy (both for lifting and in general), am still gaining strength and definitely dropping fat.

my only additional caveats (for now) are that:

1)i’ve always tolerated/responded well to low-carb diets

2)the first couple of weeks were a bitch to get through the fasting periods both energy-wise and cravings-wise, but i persisted. Once I hit week 3, both of these problems abated.

I actually feel pretty damn good on the fasting days (yes this could just be a psycho-somatic effect) and the first meal that i eat after the fast, which i normally would interpret as bland, tastes like a 5-star from the world’s greatest chef.

I imagine its similar to the feeling that Shugart describes when going back to whole food after the liquid diet ( the V-diet?) he suggests in the Physique clinic. If nothing else, it’s definitely helping me change to and/or maintain very healthy eating habits…

I have also had a great deal of success after trying different things with intermittent fasting-evolutionary fitness-the warrior diet-whatever the hell you want to call it.

I think the reason it works for ME, personally, is that I work out in the middle of the day and have a pretty hectic job. I have two scoops of Metabolic Drive! in the morning and after working out, and then a feast at night that has plenty of vegetables and meat.

In reality I guess this is not a “true” fast, what it really is, is manipulation of your hormones on 12 hour rotating cycles. 12 hours of fight and flight, which includes undereating, working, and exercising; and 12 hours of feed and breed which includes a four hour window in which to eat and relax and then 8 hours sleeping.

It’s been working for me, and by working I mean feel good throughout the day (even though I am READY TO EAT when I get home), and my body composition has changed thusly in the last five weeks:
Weight: 263 to 252.
Bodyfat: 18% to 14% (calipers)
I feel like I have more wind and strength when working out. Hit a 495 deadlift PR last week so I’m not wasting away by any stretch of the imagination.