Some. The anonymous leakage and the allegations we find later to be baseless, but made the news cycle anyway would piss me off. There has been a lot of hearsay and a shortage of facts. For instance, you have this article:
Within the article it says this:
"The officials interviewed in recent weeks said that, so far, they had seen no evidence of such cooperation."
If there is no evidence, why is there even a story?
Somebody is trying to infer that Trump colluded with Russia to hack the election by conjecture and hearsay and no evidence. And people in the intelligence community is leaking this stuff.... "Ah, Joe Shmoe had a couple of phone calls with some Russian, they must have hacked the election".
I don't think so, but there is clearly a mole somewhere that is leaking information and it doesn't take a lot of people to do a lot of damage. If there is evidence of wrong doing, then it should be brought forth.
They totally assassinated that poor Flynn guy to the point where, just the mere appearance of impropriety forced his short tenure. All because someone leaked part of a bugged phone call. Which begs the question, why are they surveilling WH staff and who else is being bugged? Or did we reveal that we have the Russian Embassy bugged?
Revealing what our intelligence is up to isn't very smart, but somebody is leaking this stuff. So, the President has a legit grievance with regards to leakage and hence has the feeling of working against him, not for him.
If the leaks continue, he may be forced to remove all the Obama appointees and replace them with friendlier people.
I would have a hard time trusting an organization giving the impression they are out to get me. And with each evidence-less accusation the divide deepens.
I don't like his tactics and never have. I would prefer more decorum and professionalism. But that's just the way he is, brash and abrasive and I don't think he is going to change. I think he will improve over time as he learns the job better, but his communication skills will always be lacking. He acts more like a pimp than a boss...
I don't think he has as big a problem with disagreements as people think. I think he's paranoid that people have it in for him and hence over protective and over reactionary. But there is a contingent that is truly out to get him, so he's not totally unjustified in his fears; but he's not classy either. And that hurts him.
Unlike Bush who understated his case in many situations, Trump overstates his case. He has some points, as there is a full on character assassination attempts, but I think he could quiet the noise if he had a little more decorum.
I think he and his opposition needs to settle down a bit.