To Brock, Bill Roberts, et al:
Thinking back to my early days of searching for information about ergogenics,
there wasn’t much available around '83, and much of what there was seemed incomprehensible
to a layperson such as myself.
Then I stumbled across the infamous ‘anabolic indice’, in one of the easier to
read books out at that time. It initially seemed like a good guide to choosing the most
efficacious compounds, however real-world experience proved this to be incorrect.
Have any of you developed a subjective ranking system of your own to rate the Biotest products along the same lines, perhaps as an intellectual exercise? I’ve read the “Supplement Round-ups” and “Stuff we like”, but they don’t feel specific enough. Just a thought.