I checked out that other site and I have to say that Alan Aragon has completely lost any credibility imo. Two articles bashing tnation from that site seem to form somewhat of an agenda. The first was comparing choclate milk to surge recovery and by playing with numbers and ignoring the large disparity between amounts of fast acting proteins, fast acting carbs and leucine between the two Aragon came to the conclusion that chocolate milk is the same if not better.
The second article begins by refuting CT’s claims using a chart that has “Realistic Rates of Lean Body Mass Gain Based on Training Status”. Apparently if you’ve been training for more than four years then you will gain at best .5-.8lbs of muscle per month. He also sites the few AAS studies that show that cycles under 10 weeks only generate 2kg-5kg in BODYWEIGHT. This is complete BS as anyone can tell you that even with ancilliaries, water retention alone can acount for 2kg or more. Certainly advanced users will in general not see as big of gains as a newbie on thier first cycle…but the assertions are still bullshit.
I do agree with some of the other posters though that as with all training programs…what you put in is what you get. If anyone who has been lifting subpar expects to achieve te same results as CT then they are delusional. By the same token, I am lookig forward to the supplemental plan and I think most of us are willing to try it and judge by our own experience.
So basically, it’s cool with me that you deleted the thread TC.