I've been through the program now for two cycles and have achieved some nice gains in mass during the time, particularly in the back and chest.
Some issues I've had;
1) The first time I did the program I was able to achieve some substantial gains in strength on some of the main lifts. The second time I did the program my records showed that my strength had returned to the same point from when I started, and I had to work my way back up to my previous maxes over the weeks in lifts like the bench press and deadlift. Seemed like the classic "two steps forward, two steps back"
2) The low rep work just doesn't cut it for my legs. When I switched up to higher reps for my legs I noticed much better results in leg size. Long term anecdotal evidence has always suggested that best results can be achieved using higher reps for legs, so I'm wondering why such low reps are advocated using this program?
Thanks again for your help and continued access to such great information.