This was done in a deliberate attempt to deceive people to make it not think it was a Muslim.
When 3 Women screaming âAllah is Greatâ stabbed a nursery worker they werenât described as wearing a burka or shouting only that women had stabbed a women.
The media is horrible when it comes to portraying religious attacks as religious.
You know someone can be Asian and a Muslim, yes? In fact, the most populace Muslim nations in the world are in Asia.
I donât know how it was covered in England, but his attack was quickly labeled as Islam-related terrorism over here. Do you have a link to a source that fails to do so?
Yes I am aware of that fact. I was referring to the point that he shouldnât of been labelled as Asian since he clearly is not. Or how typically people think of Asians.
I donât see how he âclearly is not Asian.â Why couldnât he (or his ancestors) have been born in the very large swath of territory that comprises Asia?
The âmediaâ didnât call him Asianâthe witness they were quoting did:
"Jayne Wilkinson said: âWe were taking photos of Big Ben and we saw all the people running towards us. And then there was an Asian guyin about his 40s carrying a knife about seven or eight inches long.â [emphasis mine]
Was the witness part of the liberal media cabal? Should the article have contradicted the witness by including a line to the effect âthis guy doesnât look Asian to usâhe looks MOOZ-lemâ?
They are using the nebulous term âAsianâ because the witness they were quoting used the nebulous term âAsian.â
Edit: And I have seen no evidence that the MSM are attempting âto hide the fact that itâs a very specific ethnic and religious group carrying out these attacks.â