Only a complete moron would listen to your arguments, because your position puts our children in jeopardy.
So you think pragmatic concerns affect matters of truth? Does that mean something might be false simply because it has what we might view as bad results?
I realize your line of thinking on anarchy probably goes something like “Anarchists claim theory ideology leads to better social results, anarchism produces a bad environment for children, which constitute bad social results; therefore anarchists ideological claims are false”, in which case isn’t letting pragmatics affect matters of truth but is merely arguing about pragmatic issues.
Just trying to clear that up, because what you say is a dangerous line to toe.